Large technology is also poured Countless dollars and resources in artificial intelligenceAnd preaching the brilliance of his brilliance that creates a utopia, here is a reminder that algorithms can be raised. Time. Latest evidence: You can deceive Amnesty International Overview of Google (Automated answers at the top of your search inquiries) to explain the illogical fictional expressions as if they were real.
According to a general view GregjenneR On Bluesky), “You can’t lick a twice rough” means that you cannot deceive or deceive someone again after deceiving them once.
This looks like a logical attempt to explain the term – if not only Poppycock. Google’s failure, which works in Al -Jamini, assumed that the question referred to a firm phrase instead of Mumbo Jumbo is silly designed to deceive it. In other words, Hallus Amnesty International It is still alive and healthy.
We have connected some comfort in ourselves and found similar results.
Google’s answer claimed that “you can not be a golf game without a fish” is a puzzle or playing on words, indicating that you cannot play the golf game without the necessary equipment, specifically, a golf ball. It is concrete that an overview of Amnesty International added the item that the golf ball “may be seen as a” fish “because of its shape. Hmm.
Then there is the old saying, “You cannot open the peanut butter jar with two left feet.” According to a general view of artificial intelligence, this means that you cannot do anything that requires skill or ingenuity. Again, a noble stabbing on a dedicated mission without returning to the fact that the content is verified.
There is more. “You cannot marry pizza” is a fun way to express the concept of marriage as a commitment between two people, and not a nutritional element. (Of course.) “The rope will not pull a dead fish” means that nothing can be achieved through strength or effort alone; Ready to cooperate or natural progress. (Of course!) “Eating the largest chalabea first” is a fun way to suggest that when facing a big challenge or an abundant meal, you should start first with a more essential part or element. (Hakim advice.)
This barely is the first example of hallucinations of artificial intelligence that, if not verifying facts, can lead to wrong consequences or realistic consequences. Just ask Chatgpt lawyersStephen Schwartz and Peter Ludoka, who were A $ 5,000 in 2023 To use ChatGPT to search a brief in customer lawsuit. AI Chatbot has created cases that are not present by the spouses that the lawyer of the other side (completely concept) could not locate.
The husband’s response to the judge’s discipline? “We have made a goodwill in failure to believe that a piece of technology could constitute cases of full fabric.”
This article was originally appeared on Engadget on https://www.engadget.com/ai/you-can-trick-googles-ai-verviews-neto-ed-Made-idioms-162816472.html?
[og_img]
Source link