Why Stephen King wrote under the name Richard Bakhanman

After the publication of Stephen King “Curry” in 1973, It made her adaptation of Brian de Palma named To Stark, a terrible effect. Although King has already collected the following at the time, De Palma has undoubtedly contributed to increasing the popularity of the novel (and the author). Four fixed years after writing convincing stories, King’s Gold hit “The Shing”, which is still one of the most popular stories associated with horror master’s degree. “The Shining” fills with personal elements of the life of King’s Life, with a tight mastery of suspense and speed, where the psychological and supernatural meeting of nature to form an exciting story.

advertisement

A year later, King enjoyed success again with “IT”, which can be considered as a prominent entry into this type of horror pulp that we consider a minor from it today. This is also a turn of when The king stopped writing more terrorWhile he was suffering from self -doubt and considered himself “not a great writer” but “detailed hell” (across time). These feelings do not reflect an objective fact, of course, but every creator has managed to distinguish their second talent at some point, with King’s being an exception. This talisman did not continue from self -doubt (fortunately) for a long time, but King wanted to prove to himself that he was still suffering from juice. What is the best way to measure people’s reactions to a person’s craft from writing under a pseudonym?

advertisement

Richard Bakhanman was the name of the king who chose to write under it, which he used to eliminate many stories, including the very controversial “anger” and the Virgin “The Running Man” (Who got a loose video adaptation For commodore 64, for some reason). However, the King Bakhanman’s link was in 1985 by one of Steve Brown, a library writer who recorded the similarities between the methods of writing King and Bakhanman. There is much more than that for the borrowed name story, so let’s take a look at the details.

After King was chosen as a tissue, the author confirmed that he was already using this fake identity and clarified some details On his official website. King explained that the publishing industry at that time has an undeclared base about launching one book annually, as it works on the assumption that the general public will not be open to two or more of the author himself. King admits that it is not completely correct, pointing to the prevailing type book like Daniel Steel, who “usually publish two books per year.” However, to circumvent this perceived case, King chose a Bachman pseudonym on a whim during a phone call. This is what he said on this topic:

advertisement

“I adopted Richard Bakhanman, and this made me make two books in one year (…) The name Richard Bakhanman really came when they called (publishers) and said,” We are ready to go to pressure this novel, what is the name that we should put on? (…) There was a novel by Richard Stark on my office, so I used the name Richard and this is a kind of funny because Richard Stark is in itself the name of Donald Westelik, and what was playing on the player’s scoring player was “You have not seen anything yet” by Bakhanman Turner, so I put two of them together and Richard Bashman took over. “

Before King was identified as Bakhman, these double identities have increased to more books: “The Long Walk” came after “The Stand” and “Roadwork” after “Firestarter” etc. To make Bachman’s books look distinct, King cooking some biography details about the author, who apparently served in the Coast Guard and Merchant Marine for years, in the end settling in New Hampshire as dairy farms. Master details have been added to make this person look real, such as the accidental death of Bachman (!) And the health complications that the author lived. Once King and Bachman demonstrated that they are one and the same thing, a last fact was added to the last biography: Bachman’s death due to “nickname cancer”.

advertisement

Although King’s Bachman Stint was relatively short -term, it is an integral aspect of the King’s Changeal Coather because it was allowed to write without additional pressure of public expectations. If you want to do so Read something fun about King-Bachman CommunicationI recommend reading King’s “The Dark Half”, which takes a fictional approach to this identity dividing it and putting it into the hypothesis of terror. Good things.