Why should Canada-at the present time-USA’s F35 warplanes Opinions

To cancel or not cancel.

This is the mystery faced by the new Prime Minister in Canada, Mark Carney, while he was preparing to contact the federal elections that are likely to be defined before and fights one question: Who trusts that the Canadians trust in the assumption of an American president who is going to turn a sovereign country into an official American state?

In addition to the definitions imposed on what aims to be an escalating and punitive trade war between Canada and the United States, another thorny flash point has emerged.

It constitutes the first “test” of Carney’s promised commitment to the weaning of the nation that he hopes for years, not weeks, from its long -affected adoption on a dominant southern neighbor.

Carney is pressed by the varying and hostile forces along the narrow political spectrum in Canada to abandon the remaining $ 19 billion deal-designed with its design by his predecessor, Justin Trudeau-to buy 62 F-35 combat aircraft.

Canada has already paid 16 warplanes, which are scheduled to be delivered by early next year.

governor Critics Writing on the conservative newspapers joined the former liberal foreign minister, Lloyd Accordy, and peace and disarmament groups in urging the Prime Minister to “stand” the leader of the American mercury, Donald Trump.

For the sake of rivalry, they demand Carney to follow the progress of Portugal and the planned purchase aircraft for the additional turbulent technical planes as a concrete expression of Canada’s rejection of Trump’s imperial designs, as well as a bound financial and diplomatic defense of the independence of the besieged union.

Axworthy He said One of the recent TV interview is that it would be wrong to continue “with the F-35 aircraft.

Instead, he argued that Canada should “retreat” against the warrior president who “kicked in the teeth.”

“I think this is an opportunity for us to say,” Axworthy suggested. “Do we want our army very intertwined with the American army to the extent that our discretion and independence of the movement are limited?”

It is strange that in 2025, Axworthy will challenge Canada to embrace the “opportunity” to arrest itself from the United States militarily when a series of liberal and governorate prime ministers, since 1945, has combined the continental “beginner” armed partner into the translated in the Pentagon.

However, the editor Axworthy suddenly also pointed out that the “digital box”, which includes the operating program for warplanes, is controlled by the American weapons manufacturer, Lockheed Martin.

Fear is that a revenge Trump can order the air contractor and the “defense” contractor by depriving Canada from reaching any programs that can enable the capabilities of deadly aircraft during the flight.

These calls, which are based on them while guarding the maple paper and all the feelings that the red and white national flag invokes in Canada, and set a national tendency with many Canadians who seized the “homemade purchase” movement that combines enthusiasm and momentum.

Carney, the former central bank that turned into a politician, was, of course, to respond to the prevailing national winds in the hope that they would push him and the liberal party to win.

Therefore, it was not surprising when Defense Secretary Bill Blair announced late last week that Ottawa would “re-examine” its contract with Lockheed Martin and looking for European alternatives to F-35 aircraft.

The “review” of the current deal to Carne allowed the land of “Canada first” and gave him time to consider the effects of cancellation and its consequences.

At the risk of insulting loyal and amazing readers, I can easily criticize my muddy critics, I think the maneuver that can be predicted in Carney, which you can do, in light of unconfirmed geopolitical conditions, and the wise thing to do.

Let me share two other notes aimed at providing some useful context for the prescriptions that I am about to offer Carney on how to address this accurate conflict and burning across the border.

First, if I have Drozron, I am abandoned by getting warplanes that will, in a generation or so, become outdated, spend the mountain of money on improving the young Canadians’ rapid horizons to buy a house on the unconditional horizon and burn the pensions that the elderly receive every month.

But I know that any liberal or future conservatism will be allocated-as an institutional gospel-to replace the Aging list in Canada from the CF-18 combat aircraft.

The question now, in light of Trump’s threats and lack of respect, is what will be his name in the big examination to provide these warplanes?

Second, I doubt that Carney and his advanced wardrobe will affect my advice-if they read it at all. The former head of Canada Bank spent most of his career in controlling the loud noise that is often informed, which was ever produced by members of the comment, including me.

However, since this is a “opinion” column, here is my point of view on how Carney moves to the risky and risks he is facing.

I think Carney – and therefore Canada – should keep our valuable chips close instead of going to them.

Trump may have a strong hand, however, although he is a poker player, he is a bad-poker player-vulnerable to making short bets that are considered to cause greater damage than American interests.

Carney should be patient and exploit the long game in his favor by using the purchase of F-35 suspended as a financial lever during customs tariff negotiations that can prevail well throughout the Trump period, which lasted for four years as president.

As a necessary natural result, Carney needs the rejection of the Kassar the Narcrans and Historians calling for NIX, immediately, F-35s in favor of the Swedish Saab Gripe to calm his sloping critics inside and outside the councils and editing more interested in “Acts”.

Looking at the way Trump enables the coercive and unexpected nature, there are no guarantees that this most cautious approach will be convincing or inhibit the president’s instincts.

It is worth trying. To enhance the chances of success, it must be associated with a deliberate and continuous effort to establish the speech that disturbs the chest that only serves, to excite a bumpy president.

Then there are impractical costs and ingenuity associated with the choice of a mixed fleet of aircraft in the air -bound canal.

According to what was reported, the Canadian defense planners insisted over decades that this cocoon strategy will prove expensive. Military aircraft requires two training systems, Slaslan for supply, and separate Lillars.

Keep the Chechen -like, and hold the very expensive shiny barriers, Prime Minister Carney, so that you can win the profitable bowl.

The opinions expressed in this article are the author of the author and do not necessarily reflect the position of the editorial island.