“When a few people have a lot of wealth …”: SRIDHAR VEMBU risk from Zoho

When a few of the most wealth and the majority keep, societies are not left with a few options – most of them are not desirable. This is SRIDHAR VEMBU, CEO of Zoho Corporation, in a modern post on X, where he put what he called the five societal paths in the face of inequality in wealth.

“When a few people have a lot of wealth and a lot of people have nothing, these are the five societies that you do, and we see examples of these people around the world,” Fembo wrote.

The first, and in his most ideal opinion, is that “wealth people create job opportunities and develop skills in the wider population.” The second is when “people with wealth donate reasons indirectly creating jobs.”

“DICTS dictates 1 and 2, with 1 from the best to 2. This is also the biblical tuition order to teach men how to hunt.”

The third track includes governments that enter the imposition of taxes on the wealthy and the redistribution of the poor – a approach to which it is seen. “Many Western societies have chosen 3 (taxes and redistribution that over time leads to corruption). I think 3 and 5 lead over time, so 3 is an unstable balance.”

He said that this fourth option is when “extortion networks arise from the wealthy”, often with support from the population with disappointment. Then it leads to the fifth and final option: “The wealthy uses wide security forces to resist extortion.”

One of the commentators echoed this anxiety, pointing to countries like South Africa and the regions of Latin America, where the blackmail and special security cycle led to wide fear, division and general confidence carpets. “Confidence disappears, society begins to collapse,” the response indicated. “Over time, violence becomes normal, and it takes to rebuild confidence for generations.”

VEMBU connects the issue to finance – a system that argues with dismantling wealth from work. “What the finance does is to separate wealth from work, through various plans of critical alchemy,” he wrote. “Our ancients understood this intuitively, and that is why they refused usury and other plans” earn money on money. “

“The nature and nature of wealth in turn determines, through the nature of society-yes, it is a bustling self-reactions.”

Several responses to his position stressed the need for a value -based approach to wealth. One of the users wrote: “It is extremely important to teach our youngsters about Arqa (the correct pursuit of wealth) alongside Darma (moral duty) … The purpose of profit – important lessons for young people and adults.”

Another asked: “How can we push and form society towards more than 1 and 2? Through Anging the West, we become like them over time.”