Trump urged critics to reassess the United Nations policies of immunity and visa amid security risks

The 1947 Agreement defines the obligations as a United Nations host that gives employees and members of their relatively unrestricted access to the United States

At a time when national security concerns and migration enforcement by the Trump administration are increasing, experts urge to re -examine the hosting nation agreement with attention to job immunity granted to United Nations and limited limited employees of those with UN visas.

“The United States seems to have taken a comfortable look for individuals who enter the United Nations -related country, either as employees or as representatives of various rural missions. However, we know that their United Nations employees have, and they continue to close direct relations with terrorist organizations, such as UNRWA and Hamas,Anne Pifesky, director of the Toro Institute for Human Rights and Burning and Human Rights Vemen, told Fox News Digital.

UN WATCHDOG Project on Doge Saucus calls for “Org International”

“There is a separation between the routine of welcoming and the great harm to American interests. Hosting the United Nations does not require the host country to facilitate or bear threats to its national security.”

The federal government gives G visas to employees, couples and children of international organizations, including the United Nations, who reside on or visit, the United States according to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, “If it is impossible for a G visa, under the US visa law, the G. Expectations of this rule must receive very limited.” The Ministry of Foreign Affairs also explains that “embassies and consulates in general do not require an interview for those who apply for G -1 – 4 and NATO -1 – 6 visas, although the consular employee can request an interview.”

“It seems to me that the version of G (United Nations employees) is relatively rubber exercises,” Hugh Dogan, a senior adviser to 11 former American ambassadors at the United Nations, told Fox News Digital. Although you do not require interviews with employees “it has become a matter of rest, frankly, we must always be able to assess the threat to our country.”

Dogan, a former special assistant for the President of the President of the President and Director of the International Organization, said that countries like Russia and China are only allowed to travel for a certain distance from the United Nations headquarters. “We are aware of the activities of our opponents and our presence here, but the door is open to participate in the United Nations Convention and the host country that makes this possible so that no country is prevented due to a specific political atmosphere or an issue that may be a fermentation between us and them.”

I asked Fox News Digital the Ministry of Foreign Affairs about whether it required employees interviews Hostile member statesIncluding Cuba, Venezuela, Russia, North Korea, Iran and China, but it did not receive any response. A Foreign Ministry spokesman reported that consular officers “have a complete authority to request a personal interview for any reason.”

Peter Gallo, who was previously investigating the United Nations Office for Internal Control Services (OIOS), told Fox News Digital that he was particularly concerned about the job immunity granted to United Nations employees participating in activities related to their employment. Gallo explained that “the American legal system has become acceptable to a large extent.” He added that “immunity is born from punishment.”

Republicans seek to prevent the re -appointment of the United Nations official accused of anti -Semitism

Gallo claimed that there Sexual crimes epidemic And poor behavior between United Nations employees. He referred to an accident in which the United Nations employee outside the United States made sexually harassed “a young woman in his ministry.” Gallo said that it took two years after receiving the investigation report to complete an investigation, which led to a reduction in the violating employee. Gallo said that the employee who was harassed, and her harassment remained in the same organization.

Gallo said that if employees participate in misconduct during their headquarters at the United Nations headquarters, the United States government should be able to examine cases and determine whether employees should keep their G visa.

Dogan said that if UN employees knew that (immunity) can be raised at any time by us … they may start to act differently. ”

In response to questions about whether United Nations employees have been accused of sexual misconduct in the United States, or whether United Nations employees who participated in misconduct have been canceled in G, a Foreign Ministry spokesman explained that the administration “does not provide” cancellation statistics in general. “They also said that” all applicants in the visa, regardless of the visa type and where they fall, are examined continuously. Security is examined from the time of each request, by deciding the visa, and after that during the validity period of each visa issued, to ensure that the individual remains are qualified to travel to the United States. “

“The laws in force in the United States, including criminal laws, may be respected,” said UN officials spokesman. They added that this “applies to those who hold diplomatic immunity to their locations as well.”

Among the employees who raised internal warning bells, there is a special relationship with the United Nations in the occupied Palestinian territories Francesca Albaniz, who traveled To the United States in 2024 to submit a report to the third committee of the General Assembly. Albaniz, who has been widely condemned by the high -scale American diplomats and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs.

Click here to get the Fox News app

In addition to the rehabilitation of “Rubber Stam” G, the employees of international organizations such as United Nations can qualify for green cards if they spend at least half of employment within the United States, or they were in the United States for a total of 15 years before retirement.