On Thursday, a federal judge prevented the directives of the Trump administration It threatened to cut off federal financing For public schools with Diversity, stock and inclusive programs.
The ruling came in a lawsuit filed by the National League for Education and the American Civil Liberties Union, which accused the Republican administration of giving “mysterious, unconstitutional” directives and violating the rights of the first amendment to teachers.
On Thursday, another judge in Maryland postponed the date of the validity of some directives to combat the Ministry of Education in the United States, and a third judge in Washington, DC, prevented another item from the in effect.
In February, the administration told schools and colleges that it needed to end any practice that distinguishes people based on their race. Earlier this month, the states ordered the assembly of signatures of local school systems that are witnessing compliance with civil rights laws, including rejecting what the federal government calls “DEI illegal practices”.
The directives do not bear the power of law but threaten the use of civil rights to rid Dei schools. Schools have been warned that the continuation of these practices “in violation of federal law” can lead to the US Department of Justice andEnd the grants and federal contracts.
The District Court in the United States, Landia Macaviri in New Hampshire, said that April speech does not show what the administration believes that the DEI program requires it or when it is believed that such programs cross the line to violate the Civil Rights Law. “Do not even determine the message” Dei “.
The judge also said that there is a reason for the belief that the administration’s actions amount to a violation of the rights of freedom of expression for teachers.
“A professor contradicts the speech in 2025 if she expresses her view of her teaching that structural racism is present in America, but she does not do so if she refuses to exist of structural racism. This is to distinguish the point of view of textbooks,” Mcaviri wrote.
A spokesman for the Ministry of Education did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
The states were granted until the end of Thursday to submit a certificate of compliance with their schools, but some have indicated that they would not comply with this. Education officials in some democratic countries said that the administrationIts power exceededAnd that there is nothing illegal about Dei.
The February 14 Memorandum of the Department, officially known as the “Dear Colleague” letter, said that the schools promoted Dei’s efforts at the expense of white American and Asian students. It greatly expands the interpretation of the Supreme Court’s decision for the year 2023, prohibits the use of race in admission to the college for all aspects of education, including employment, promotion, scholarships, housing, graduation ceremonies and campus life.
In the ruling in Maryland, the American boycott judge, Stephanie Gallagher, was postponed. I found that it was incorrectly issued, and the teachers are forced to choose between “an injury by suppressing their discourse or by facing implementation to exercise their constitutional rights.” This lawsuit was filed by the American Federation of Teachers, one of the largest teachers ’unions in the country.
“The court agreed that this mysterious and unconstitutional condition is clearly a dangerous attack on students, our profession, our sincere history and the same knowledge,” Randy Winjern, Aft president, said in a statement.
A judge in Washington has granted a preliminary judicial order against the ratification speech after NACP has failed to define specific DEI practices that would contradict the law.
All three lawsuits argue that guidance limits academic freedom and that it is very mysterious, which leaves schools and teachers in a state of forgetting about what they might do, such as whether it is still allowed to voluntary students’ groups for minority students.
A request for guidance in April from the states collection of certificates form from local educational areas as well as signing it on behalf of the state, ensuring that schools are compatible with the 1964 Civil Rights Law.
President Donald Trump, Linda McMahon, warned of possible financing discounts if the states did not return the model by Friday.
In an interview on Tuesday on Fox McMahon’s business network said, he refuses to sign, “it can” risk some goal in their areas. “She said that the purpose of the model is” to ensure that there is no discrimination that occurs in any of the schools. “
Schools and states are already required to provide assurances to this meaning in separate papers, but the new model adds a language to Dei, excusing that the use of diversity programs for discrimination can bring financing discounts, fines and other penalties.
The model threatens the access of schools to the first address, and the largest source of federal revenue for education K-12 and the artery of life for schools in low-income areas.
This story was originally shown on Fortune.com
https://fortune.com/img-assets/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/AP25113784490343_102419-e1745572592656.jpg?resize=1200,600
Source link