The Trump team loses the note by mistake in putting its case against the pricing of the congestion

Sean Duffy, Minister of Transport, Donald Trump, would like to kill crowding in New York City. Donald Trump does not believe that he has a lot of case. We know that, thanks to a clear mistake by the legal Doj team, which was loaded and then removed an internal memorandum that presents its opinion that the efforts to kill the fees “unlikely” be victory over the court.

11 pages– It was transferred on Wednesday night to the list on the ongoing lawsuit between the New York Transport Authority and Dofi Duffy before it came down – originally on April 11 to the great trial lawyer in Dot Irene Hindrikson, and advised her and her team to change their approaches or risk losing their case.

Dot defends Duffy decision The project announced illegal. However, the Ministry of Justice warned Duffy’s actions of dismantling the project, “It was in violation of the law, the eyes, the procedural, volatile, and violation of legal procedures” – it does not seem good if you are in charge of defending the validity of the procedures in the court. In this way, the lawyers of the Ministry of Justice concluded that “Judge Lehman or courts are unlikely to support the Secretary’s decision on the legal foundations.”

Given that the current position appears to be a loser, the lawyer for the Ministry of Justice recommended that the DOT change and argue that the outcome is not in line with the agency’s goals and was canceled as “a issue of the agency’s priorities” – a position that can be defense more legally under the regulations set by the management and budget office. According to BloombergThis argument fell into the offices of the point.

Usually, all of this will happen behind the scenes, the ends will greet their teeth and move forward with a unified front. But then the Ministry of Justice advanced and the document was carried out by chance – reality confirmed Thursday morning in A. A message submitted to the court This was unintentionally approved that he had unintentionally uploaded a distinguished document to the public list and asked the court to close the document permanently. They wrote: “Although the contents of the document were published in news reports, the document was made by mistake and should not be considered part of the court schedule.” Instead chose the court Temporary sealAlthough it seems a little ridiculous given the extent of the document widely available at this stage.

Stopping the Ministry of Justice to download the document by mistake is a little sudden. Fortunately, the point behavior is much more on the brand. in A statement of court newsA spokesman for the agency asked, “Did the SDNY lawyer in this case be incompetent, or was this their attempt to resist?” He described the same spokesperson, whose name was not revealed, “The misconduct”, and said: “It is sad to see a major legal organization that continues to fall into this shame.” at least someone On the ball in this chaos!