The Supreme Court says that you should drink more shit water

The United States Supreme Court issued a ruling on Tuesday, which set some rules that allowed the Environmental Protection Agency to reduce the amount of pollution that was emptied in the US waterways. The verdict was 5-4, with Amy Kony Barrett joining the judges of the most liberal court in the opposition.

The case was submitted before San Francisco City After the Environmental Protection Agency asked to stop emptying a lot of sewage in the Pacific Ocean in 2019. San Francisco city filed a lawsuit against groups such as the National Mining Association, American fuel manufacturers and petrochemical to fight against the Environmental Protection Agency, on the pretext that the rules were very wide.

The case focused on the 1972 clean water law and whether the environmental protection agency rules on the amount of human waste allowed in large surfaces of water are specific enough. The city of San Francisco was facing about $ 313 million of fines and about $ 10.6 billion in promotions to its treatment facilities to comply with the environmental protection agency standards, according to L. Washington Post.

San Francisco has an old pattern of water treatment facility that combines wastewater and rain water, which leads to the fullness of the water that has been unloaded with human disgust. The clean water law does not specifically put what to do to make the water clean, which makes the city directly responsible for the quality of the water, according to what it mentioned Bloomberg Law. The city argued that it was very mysterious, with the approval of the Supreme Court.

Judge Alto, who writes to the majority, explained that it was not fair for the Environmental Protection Agency to impose “crushing penalties if the water quality in its receiving water is less than the applicable criteria,” according to a copy of to rule Posted online. Conservative judges John Roberts, Clarence Thomas, Brett Cavano and Nil Gorsh joined the opinion.

Amy Kony Baret wrote the opposition, noting that although the majority opinion argues that the language of the Environmental Protection Agency is very mysterious, the court “does not explain what the other action path can take.” Barrett also indicated that the drainage of water led to “tuna, scum, and floating materials, including toilet paper, in Meshin Kreik.” The most liberal judges, Sonia Sotoomor, Elena Kagan, and Kitanji Brown Jackson, were usually stood up to governor Barrett.

The American Court of Appeal for the Ninth Chamber had previously stood at the Environmental Protection Agency. But this new Supreme Court ruling is now the land law, as long as everyone agrees to follow it. The difficult thing in the rulings of the Supreme Court is that these nine judges have no way to actually impose their rulings. We have seen President Donald Trump’s decisions Ignore court orders Recently, the laws do not work unless everyone decides to follow up of certain court decisions.