The South Korean Court to judge a political fate of the president who was isolated on the order of the fighting law

The Constitutional Court in South Korea is scheduled to rule on the dismissal of President Yun Suk Yol on Friday, either to remove him from his position or restore his powers four months after the country threw the country into a disturbed declaration of the martial law.

The court was scheduled to issue a ruling on Yoon in a televised session at the national level, which is scheduled to start at 11 am local time. At least six of its eight judges must vote to remove Yun in order to support accountability.

If the court orders Yoon, national elections will be held within two months to find a new president. If the court rules for the president, he will immediately return to the duties of the presidency.

Yun’s announcement of martial law continued on December 3, just six hours before forcing him to lift it after the legislative body controlled by the liberal opposition quickly managed to vote on it. Later in December, the association surveyed, and suspended its powers and sent its case to the Constitutional Court. Union faces a separate criminal trial for the alleged rebellion.

Whatever the ruling on Friday, experts expect that it will increase the local divisions. In the past four months, millions have moved to the streets to condemn or support Yun, which has already depth the severe conservative division in South Korea.

In the face of fears that violence could explode after the ruling, the police deployed thousands of officers on Thursday and put the police buses, the walls praising and plastic wars to close the streets leading to the court. The army said it was planning to increase its monitoring position.

Thousands of competing demonstrators continued their gathering, making their final appeal to the court to support or refuse to isolate Yun.

“For four months, we were exhausted and threatened, but our anger towards Yoon Sok Yol is still strong,” the protester Kim Miu shouted during an anti -Yun gathering.

Earlier in the day, Yoon supporters gathered nearby, waving the flags of South Korea and the United States and raising signs saying: “The fraudulent dismissal will definitely be refused.” On the stage, the protest leader has repeatedly led chants, “Let’s protect him!”

The most controversial case was to the dismissal trial in Yoon was the reason that he sent hundreds of forces and police officers to the National Assembly, election offices and other places after declaring martial law.

Although the period of martial law ended without violence, the proposal of the dismissal accuses Yoon of violating the constitution and other laws by suppressing the association’s activities, trying to detention politicians and undermine peace throughout the country.

Yoon said that sending him to the soldiers to the association was supposed to maintain the system. He also said that he imposed martial law in a desperate attempt to attract attention to the “evil” of the main liberal Democratic Party, whose agenda hindered and grabbed many of his senior officials. However, senior military officials and police who were sent to the association witnessed that Yoon ordered them to detain competitors and prevent the association from voting.

Prime Minister Han Dac Soo, the country’s representative leader, urged the competing aspects repeatedly to accept any court ruling on Friday.

Shen Yun-Hayy, 63, a office worker who attended the anti-Leon demonstrations three times, said that she will be held against Yoon again if the court prepared his presidential powers.

And she said, “If Yun’s isolation is canceled, our country will drown in the abyss.” “Yoon tried to solve things strongly when he was political driven to an angle. This was a mistake. We are a democratic country and should have been following a compromise.”