The rules of the American judge, Romisa Ozturk must be transferred from Louisiana to Vermont Courts News

The court says that a detained student in support of Palestine showed violations of “important evidence” of her constitutional rights.

Washington, DC, A federal judge in the United States ordered the government to transfer a Turkish student who is supportive of events, Truth OztukTo Vermont to the Court to assess the legal challenges to arrest her.

On Friday’s decision, the boycott court sessions, William, found that Ozturk – which is currently being held in Louisiana – provided “important evidence” to support allegations that her detention violates her rights to freedom of expression and the rights of due legal procedures.

Oztuk Arrested A visa was canceled in March. Supporters say that she was targeting an editorial that she participated in its authorship last year, and criticized the University of Tatz for rejecting the decision of the students of the students who called on the school to withdraw from Israeli companies.

In order for these allegations to be evaluated, sessions wrote, you must listen to the court of Ozturk in court.

“The court concludes that this case will continue in this court with Mrs. Oztuk physically present for the rest of the procedures,” he wrote.

The judge gave the government until May 1 to transfer Oztuk and set a bond hearing on May 9 until it met a temporary version.

Ozturk has been sent to a detention facility in Louisiana, while critics say it is part of a government effort to remove detainees from their supporters and lawyers-and put them in legal areas with conservative tendencies.

Tatst University student was arrested near her home in Massachusetts on March 30. The accident monitoring footage shows convincing immigration officers, who did not define themselves as law enforcement, approach them on the street and seize her hands.

Critics described the incident as abduction.

A student visa has been canceled as part of a Huge campaign By the administration of President Donald Trump to foreign students who protested or criticized the Israel war on Gaza.

The sessions confirmed that the only evidence that can be determined that the United States government is using it to detention and deportation of Ozturk is the opening.

“Her evidence supports her argument that the government’s motive or the purpose of its detention is to punish it for a partner in forming an article in the university’s campus newspaper, which criticized the administration of the University of Tatz, and the cold of the political discourse of others.”

“The government has not yet provided any evidence that supports a motive, an alternative or legal purpose for the arrest of Mrs. Ozturk.”

He also confirmed that First amendmentWhich protects freedom of expression, “has long extended” to non -citizens living in the United States.

The sessions of the issue that oversee the body of the body are known. It challenges the detention of Oztuk, not the broader payment of its deportation.

Deportation issues are reviewed through a separate system, as non -citizens bring their cases before the immigration judge who works within the executive authority. It is not a separate part of the government, as in an independent judiciary.

Defenders say immigration Judges often “Rubber-Stamp” decisions of the executive branch where they work. Louisiana’s immigration judge denied the release of Ozturk on bail earlier this week.

Immigration cases can be resumed to the Immigration Appeal Council, an administrative body. As a last resort, migrants can submit a petition to present their case before the Court of Appeal, which is part of the ordinary judicial system.

The Trump administration stresses that the law gives it a deadline for immigration issues – and this in turn provides the vast forces of the presidency that replaces concerns about freedom of expression and legal procedures.

To clarify the deportation, the Minister of Foreign Affairs Marco Rubio It has rarely hosted a ruling from the Immigration and Nationality Law, which gives it the authority to remove non -citizens who see it “severe severe consequences in foreign policy” of the United States.

But part of Friday’s ruling can have comprehensive effects on Oztuk and other students who face deportation.

The sessions rejected the idea that detained immigrants could be ignored by their constitutional rights due to an administrative process.

The judge said that the government argues that the Immigration Law “is granted countless authority that cannot be reviewed to detain individuals for weeks or months, even if the detention is clearly unconstitutional.”