Social media users have discovered a controversial use of the new Gemini Ai from Google: removing watermarks from images, including from the images published by Getty Images and other well -known media clothes.
Last week, Google expanded its arrival at Gemini 2.0 Flash The model generation feature, which allows the form to create and edit image content. that it strong abilityAll accounts. But it seems to have a little handrail. Gemini 2.0 Flash will create incomplete images Imagine celebrities and Publishing personalitiesAnd – as indicated earlier – remove the watermarks from the existing images.
New Skill Onlocked: Gemini 2 Flash Model is really great in removing watermarks in pictures! pic.twitter.com/6qik0ffcv
Deedydas March 15, 2025
As several x and I responded Users note that Gemini 2.0 Flash will not only remove watermarks, but try to fill any gaps created by deleting the watermark. Other tools that operate with the same Amnesty International are also doing this, but it seems that Gemini 2.0 Flash is exceptionally skilled-and-free for use.
Gemini 2.0 Flash, available at Google AI Studio, is amazing to edit photos using simple text claims.
He can also remove watermarks from images (and places a hidden watermark instead 🤣) pic.twitter.com/znhtqst1z
– Tanay Jaipuria (Tanayj) March 16, 2025
To be clear, the Gemini 2.0 Flash image generation feature is classified as “experimental” and “not for production of production” at the present time, and it is only available in the Google tools facing the developer like Artificial Intelligence Studio. The model is not the ideal watermark remover. Gemini 2.0 Flash seems to struggle with some semi -transparent aquatic signs and aquatic marks that are characterized by large parts of the images.
However, some copyright holders will definitely face a problem with no restrictions on the use of Gemini 2.0 Flash. Models including man Claude 3.7 Sonata And Openai’s GPT-4O Frankly refuses to remove watermarks; Claude calls on the removal of the watermark from “immoral and possibly illegal” image.
The removal of the watermark without the approval of the original owner is illegal under the Copyright Law in the United States (according to what he said Lawyers like this)) Outside rare exceptions.
Google did not immediately respond to a request for comment sent outside the regular working hours.
https://techcrunch.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/GettyImages-2196352264.jpg?w=1024
Source link