The NC elections council must follow the Supreme Court plan in the last elections that have not been dissolved 2024

A federal judge order The Electoral Council in North Carolina To start implementing the state’s Supreme Court’s decision in the last 2024 elections that were not resolved in the country.

On Friday, the Supreme Court of North Carolina issued a decision that partially overturned a week by a committee from the Court of Appeal at the mediator level, which preferred Republican Jefferson Griffin. Griffin runs Democratic auxiliary justice Alison Reger has a razor of 734 votes out of more than 5.5 million votes last autumn in the elections for a seat at the highest court court. Griffin officially protested more than 65,000 polling votes that cover three categories.

The largest category of voters who face a challenge – approximately 60,000 – included polling cards by people who have been registered to vote since 2004, but their records lack the driver’s license number or the last four numbers of the social security number.

The prevailing Friday opinion said that the Court of Appeal made a mistake by announcing that these voices should not be calculated. The opinion said that the blame is stabilized with the state elections council for years for years to correctly collect these numerical identifiers, not voters. These voters ultimately proved their identity by compliance with the new state identity identity law, and the legal race for a long time says that these errors by election officials cannot lead to the cancellation of voting.

Federal judge kicks the battle on North Carolina’s Supreme Court elections to the state court

The Electoral Council said in a statement on Monday that it will provide, “as soon as possible,” detailed instructions “for the affected provinces and voters on how to comply with the decision.”

“the Supreme Court Decision It was removed from protest voters who did not include voter registration forms, a driver’s license number or the last four numbers of the social security number (and did not achieve a square indicating that they lack these numbers). The state council said that these voters – the largest group of voters who face a challenge by the protest – must provide that information to the election councils in the provinces to ensure their votes for the Supreme Court competition in the general elections for the year 2024.

But the majority of the judges – all registered Republicans – called on the minimum decision of the court that the additional voting of two other categories was dismissed in this outcome. The prevailing court in the court says that some of these voters, who are likely to be thousands of people who serve or live abroad, will remain an opportunity to determine the identity of the images or an exemption model for their choice in the race to stay in the number.

The state’s Supreme Court also agreed to get rid of votes from people who did not live in North Carolina or the United States completely.

The State Elections Council said on Monday: “The decision of the Supreme Court will require military voters and citizens abroad who submitted a absent polling to submit a copy of their identity identity, or an exclusion of the image identifier, to ensure their votes for the number of the Supreme Court competition in the general elections for the year 2024.” “The decision will also require some election councils in the provinces to determine and remove from counting – in the Supreme Court Competition only – votes from American citizens who have never lived in the United States, but have parents’ links to North Carolina.”

Reges and the state election council, who had previously cast the official Griffin protests of more than 65,000 voting, had previously referred to plans to return to the federal court if necessary, if the judges were standing on Griffin to reach federal election violations and voting rights laws. Reges’ lawyers submitted a request late Friday in the US District Court in a rally, demanding the judge to issue a judicial order prohibiting the decisions of the state’s appeal court immediately.

Dem takes the target to Trump in 2026 to launch the Senate for “our economy tanks”

American boycott judge Richard Maires – nominated by the president Donald Trump During his first term – the state election council on Saturday ordered the compliance of the plan developed by the Supreme Court to resolve the electoral conflict. Myers set a final date on April 15 to the state’s election council “submitting a notice to the court of its treatment efforts, including the number of voters who are likely to be affected and the provinces made by these voters in the poll.”

The judge also presented both sides until April 20 to submit opening summaries until April 28 to submit final summaries in the case.

Maarz ordered the state’s Supreme Court not to ratify the election results, “pending more of this court.” It is not known whether the distinctive voting cards that can finally come out of the number can turn the result to Griffin, the same judge of the current Appeal Court. Griffin did not sit on the three judges committee, which was sentenced to the majority of her last week, and Rij is not involved in the deliberations of the Supreme Court.

Meanwhile, Reges hosted the “Protecting our Voices” gathering in the capital of Rally on Monday.

“I will not give up my battle to protect those who fight for us,” said Regez, who served his father and brother in the army. “This represents a real burden and a threat to voters in North Carolina state in official uniforms, voters in North Carolina and who work in the field of mission, external service employees, students studying abroad, real threat, real burden, and we will do our best to make sure their vote.”

Republican strategy Paul Schumker issued a statement on behalf of Griffin, saying that Friday’s ruling “is consistent with our request, and it is clear that the matter requires a comprehensive review, which was set by the courts.”

Click here to get the Fox News app

“The most worrying thing is that Judge Regez’s desire to conduct interviews and gatherings to charge this case outside the courts,” said Shomker, according to Rawwal. “It is clear that Judge Regez is a judicial activist who believes that judges must develop new laws, not to explain the laws caused by the legislative body of the state.”

The Associated Press contributed to this report.