The most science fiction series in Holo comes from the exit of the former Machina

Even a quick look at “Ex Machina” from Alex Garland reveals an objective tension between free and inevitable will. In the movie, The presence of an emotional robot named Ava (Alicia Fisk Alexander) It is inevitable as inevitable, as you need to perform a Torring test will determine whether it has developed awareness. Science men who reside in the humanity of AFA (or their absence) view the uniqueness of artificial intelligence as an inevitable or inevitable matter.

advertisement

Specifically, the fact that the robot like AFA can express feelings and mimic human behavior as inevitable – the issue of “Matthew,” no “if. This view weakens every moral dilemma that comes with the creation of artificial intelligence and whether human beings have the right to play God while playing with knowledge. Garland uses this basis to weave a deep movie on technology, development and the relationship between man and his creation.

When the Alex Garland Series Ltd. “Devs” launched its first trailer in 2019, the director talked about the topic of inevitability that clearly passes through the FX program (via FX (across TV guide):

“I read more about science more than anything else, and I started with two things. One of them was about the principle of this inevitability, which mainly says that everything that happens in the world depends on the cause and the result … which has all kinds of effects on that. One of them is that it comes out of the free will, but the other is that in a strong computer, you can use inevitability to predict the future material and understand the past.”

advertisement

“Devs” revolves around Lily (Sonoya Mizuno), an amya software engineer, Mega Technology, which represents a fairly evil shadow with its presence. A person close to Laila dies, which demands the right to seek the truth to the bottom Amazing rabbit hole filled with everything from inevitable philosophy to quantum computing. Garland accompanies a complex and ambitious science fiction series that asks relevant questions, but is “Devs” any good? Let’s dive into it.

“Devs” is not the type of TV that takes stabs other than the heart in the philosophical questions it deals. Garland is in every ounce of sensitive care in the essence of the unique symptom: it is very beautiful, beautiful, and often concretely concrete. Each high -magic idea is fed throughout its eight episodes with us with a controlled hand, and we are supposed to think at a time when the central ambiguity of the exhibition reveals.

advertisement

But sometimes, the same dominant hand begins to suffocate, test even the most patient among us. Most characters are limited to repeating sterile courses because of – guess that – inevitable, which greatly reduces the scope (and the effect) of their tragedy. When someone exercises free will, “Devs” makes it easily investigated by anyone who has even an ounce of courage. After that it happens several times, the conflicts feel some time, although they are not predicted.

Lily is not the only person besieged in this maze, as the amya founder and CEO (Nick Off Off) is a steady and fateful presence throughout the exhibition. Forrest builds a super computer that uses inevitable principles to know EverythingWhich allows it to comb over the past and the future using causation as a standard. When we scrub layers Why The technology pole like Forest will do what it does, the answer lies in sadness, which is coagulating an open, non -processed wound.

advertisement

Its motives are simple, but Garland treats the fundamental feelings that can be relied upon as a secondary basis for the cold world that he builds. Human drama exists, but it is not necessary, as our eyes are transformed again and again to the philosophical concepts in which Forest contradicts the super computer as part of its goal.

“Devs” deserves more noise, for sure, as there is a lot to dismantle it in this beautiful offer and meanings about the ideas that may follow the precedence over everything else in a more sterile future than what we would like to be. Although the story of Garland often submerges under her ambition, it is still interesting enough to challenge the masses and its prior concepts about contemplative TV.