The legal expert predicts the results of the trial

As the countdown to Blake Blake and Justin BalouniA legal expert said that the film director has a greater chance to win,

Livly and Badouni have participated in a legal battle since the actress filed a complaint with sexual harassment against her, “It ends with us” in December 2024.

She has since responded to a right to fitness with a 400 million dollar lawsuit against her and her husband, Ryan Reynolds.

A lawyer believes that he has a “strongest issue” in his legal battle with Levli.

Dina Doll appeared in the documentary “in conflict: Lively vs. Baldoni”, which begins to broadcast in Max on March 31 and break the case.

Near the end of the documentary, she said to everyone People Magazine“My professional opinion, Blake Levli has a stronger issue. Because all Justin’s arguments about fame and control do not refute her claim of sexual harassment.”

The dolls continued, “These allegations – improvisation in kissing, description of the genitals, talks about pornography – regardless of your workplace, it seems that this is a very strong basis for the claim of sexual harassment.”

In the documentary, Doll also discussed the Lively and Baldoni version of the events in their claims, and said that “the latter’s argument is not in fact that these elements did not happen; it says only that there is a different perspective, that they were more compatible.”

“Both sides want to see their point of view,” she added.

She said: “In the conflict: Livly against Baldouni” is a shorter version than.

The new documentary will explore the legal battle between Blake Livley and Justin Baldoni.

According to a press release issued by ITN Productions, the documentary film will examine the legal complaint of Blake Levli against Justin Baldoni, which accused him of sexual misconduct on his movie “It ends up with us.”

It also claimed that he rented a public relations company to launch a campaign to distort the Internet against it. Baldoni denied the allegations and made a $ 400 million defamation suit.

“With the trial specified in March 2026, the special will be looking for evidence on both sides and responding to the dispute on social media,” version I mentioned.

Ian Russell, the president of the international at ITN Productions, described the documentary as “in time and in -depth the Hollywood story that has acquired the world era.”

Baldouni claims that Jones “started this catastrophic sequence of events” by violating his privacy and leakage of contacts for the Levli team.

His lawyer, Brian Friedman, male for each diverse“Mrs. Jones dropped the communications from the phone that she took incorrectly from her own partner to her group, (Levli Personal Advertisement), Leslie Sloan, as soon as Jones ended his cause by Wever because of her illegal behavior.”

Jones previously worked with the current publicity of Badoni, Jennifer Abel, who also sues her.

In December 2024, Lively filed a lawsuit accusing Baldoni of sexual harassment and creating a toxic work environment while filming “It ends up with us.”

She claimed that a curse’s behavior caused “severe emotional distress” and detailing her concerns in a meeting, as she requested “no more displaying nude videos or pictures of women” and “there are no other signals from the genital organs and crew.” In addition, she asked the inferior to stop discussing her weight and late father.

However, she offered a huge multiplication of $ 400 million, accusing Livly and her husband, Ryan Reynolds, from defamation, civil extortion, and the invasion of privacy.

He argued by a lawsuit: “This is an issue about two of the world’s most powerful stars that spread their huge strength to steal a full movie directly from the hands of its director and production studio.”

He also sent legal notifications to Disney CEOs regarding “Deadpool & Wolverine” “Deadpool & Wolverine” “Nicepool”, which he claimed was a deliberate irony.

Reynolds asked the judge to reject him from the lawsuit, on the pretext that the legal procedure he had taken was driven by “gentle, skinny anger over the personality of a movie.”

He defended his right to be described as a “Pratuator”, saying, “Mr. Reynolds has the right to the first amendment to Mr. Balouni’s contract – or any man that Mr. Reynolds believes his wife sexually – in deep contempt.”

Livley’s lawyers applied for her dismissal, and described a lawsuit as “revenge and wandering.”

They argued, “The law prohibits lawsuits for defamation in weapons, such as this, for revenge on individuals who have made legal claims or publicly talked about sexual harassment and revenge.”

In response, a lawyer said, “A recently vital proposal to reject itself from the self -disaster that she launched is one of the most hateful examples of misuse of our legal system.”