The legal definition of women refers to the “biological race”, the rules of the Supreme Court in the United Kingdom

Digest opened free editor

Rola Khaleda, FT editor, chooses her favorite stories in this weekly newsletter.

The highest court in the UK ruled that the definition of a “woman” in equality legislation indicates a biological person born in a blow to activists for the rights of transgender people.

the supreme court I found in a unanimous decision that the meaning of “women” in the anti -discrimination law did not extend to a passing woman with a certificate of gender recognition.

The decision that was closely monitored on Wednesday was welcomed by the groups that were a campaign for the priority of sex -based rights, but have prompted fears of undermining protection for transgender individuals.

“The terms” women “and” sex “in the 2010 Equality Law indicate a biological woman and biological sex.

However, he added: “We recommend not to read this ruling as a victory for one or more in our society at the expense of another. It is not.”

He said that the equality law has another protection for transgender people, including discrimination and harassment.

The UK government said that the ruling “brings clarity and confidence to women and service providers such as hospitals, shelters and sports clubs.” He added that “the single sexual spaces are protected in the law and will always be protected by this government.”

The sentence issued by the Supreme Court, which has a jurisdiction throughout the United Kingdom, stems from a lengthy legal battle in Scotland.

The Campaign Group for Women Scotland (FWS) challenged the Scottish government on a draft law approved in 2018 aimed at increasing female representation in public bodies.

FWS initially succeeded in challenging the law, which included women in its definition of women. The court court ruled in Edinburgh in 2022 that the matter was outside the legal authority of the Scottish Parliament.

However, in response to this ruling, the Scottish government changed its approach to the issuance of revised legal guidance, saying that the meaning of women under the 2010 law of 2010 extended to a person with a sex certificate.

FWS challenged this directive on the basis that sex according to the Equality Law referred to its biological meaning, and the Scottish government was overcoming its powers by redefining the meaning of “women”.

Scottish courts rejected the FWS challenge, but the case went to the UK Supreme Court, which ruled this case on Wednesday.

Chelsea Feni, a employment partner at the law firm Stevens & Bolton, said the ruling would refer to it in many upcoming conflicts.

She said that employers may need to review human resources policies to ensure their compatibility with the updated definition of women.

She added that policies related to one sex spaces can exclude sexually transformed persons with gender recognition certificates from regions that are not in line with their biological gender.

“However, employers must notice that the 2010 Equality Law still gives transgender people from discrimination through protected properties to reset the sexes,” said Viny.

Elizabeth Mackelon, the Didlaw administrative partner, described the antiquities as “huge”.

She said: “The employers will now have to consider the policies of their” inclusion “regarding the” women “facilities and ensure that they understand that women, for the purposes of the law of equality, means” biological woman. “

The Scottish Greens described the ruling as “deeply related to human rights” and “a major blow to some of the most marginalized people in our society.”

“It can remove important protection and leave many converts and their loved ones very worried,” said MSP.