The judge says that the leadership of Dog Ilon Musk is violating the total designation of the constitution.

A federal judge wrote on Tuesday that the role of Elon Musk, who supervises the Ministry of Government’s efficiency, is a violation of the condition of appointing the United States constitution.

Theodore Chuang, a judge at the American Provincial Court of Maryland, wrote in opinion There is more than sufficient evidence – most of them are the statements made by Musk and Donald Trump – which shows that the richest man in the world is really behaving as a president of Dog despite the government’s claim that he is just a “special adviser to the president.”

Chuang issued an opinion on a case against Musk and Doug by unveiled workers at the United States International Development Agency (USAID). The judge also wrote that the measures taken by Musk in this role, such as the closure of the United States Agency for International Development – which MUSK said he threw in.Wood– So it is likely to be unconstitutional as well.

“Musk has practiced an actual authority at the United States Agency for International Development that he was only a properly appointed officer who can exercise,” he wrote. (The United States officer is a legal discrimination set by the appointment item.)

Chuang comes more than 50 days after Trump took office and allowed Musk to start cutting off government agencies With the Duj team. His opinion is the most direct snapshot through the musk arc and a promoter among many lawsuits filed over the past two months.

In his opinion, Chuang ordered the restoration of some of the US Agency for International Development and Restricted Musk and Doug from taking other steps to dismantle the agency.

It is not clear whether Musk and Dog will follow this arrangement; Musk and President Trump have spent the past few days send on Social media Praying that the judges who judge against their actions should be isolated. Trump’s promotion of this idea is outside the behavior of the presidents who preceded him, the President of the Supreme Court, John Roberts, issued a rare public statement that honors him.

“For more than two centuries,” Roberts books“It has been proven that accountability is not an appropriate response to the dispute regarding a judicial decision.