Foreign ministers of Group 7 countries overcame their differences on Friday Ukraine Regional integrity and caution Russia To follow Kyiv in accepting a ceasefire or facing more penalties.
Their common environment followed weeks of tension between American allies and President Donald Trump due to the increase in Western trade, security and policy related to Ukraine.
On Friday, Trump urged Russian President Vladimir Putin to spare the Ukrainian forces that are pushed abroad from the Russian Kursk region and said there was a “very good opportunity” that could end the war.
Trump posted on social media after his envoy, Steve Witkeov, held a lengthy meeting with Putin on Thursday evening in Moscow, described by Trump as “very good and productive.”
The Kremlin said that Putin sent Trump a message about his ceasefire plan, which Kiev agreed, through Witkeov, expressing “cautious optimism” that an agreement can be reached to end the three -year -old conflict.
Putin said on Thursday that he supported Trump’s proposal in principle, but the fighting cannot be stopped until several decisive conditions were set, which raises the possibility of longer negotiations.
US Secretary of State Marco Rubio told reporters after the Group of Seven meetings that there was a “optimistic” reason for the ceasefire and peace after Putin’s observations, but he would not address his declared conditions.
G7 officials were afraid that they would not be able to agree on a comprehensive document that touches on geopolitical issues from all over the world, and the divisions that they said could have played in the hands of Russia and China.
Get national news
As for the news that affects Canada and around the world, he participated in the urgent news alerts that were delivered directly when it occurs.
“When it comes to various issues, Ukraine and the Middle East, we had sessions talking about these different issues, materials, and the goal is to maintain a strong G7 unit,” Canadian Foreign Minister Melanie Jolie told reporters.
A group of seven ministers from Britain, Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan and the United States, along with the European Union, have held in the remote tourist town of La Malbaie, which is located in Quebec Hills, to attend meetings on Thursday and Friday, which was in the past widely compatible.
But in the period before the first G7 meeting for the presidency of Canada, the formulation of the agreed final statement was difficult with quarrels on the language related to Ukraine, the desire of the Middle East and Washington’s desire to formulate more severe on China.
The statement reaffirmed their firm support for Ukraine in defending its regional safety, its right to exist, its freedom, sovereignty and independence. “
Regional safety in Ukraine was largely absent from the American narration because the Trump administration reached power on January 20. The United States has not yet ruled out the possibility that Kiev will give up the lands.
Ukrainian President Foludmir Zelinsky said on Friday that the region’s issue was discussed during a meeting of Ukrainian and American officials in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, but will require a difficult dialogue.
“A comprehensive, just and lasting peace that is in line with the United Nations Charter,” the European Union’s foreign policy chief Kaja Callas told Reuters, referring to an invitation to “a comprehensive, just and lasting peace that is in line with the United Nations Charter.”
A previous text indicating the need for security guarantees to ensure that the truce is replaced with “assurances”, but they warned Moscow against following Kiev in agreeing to a ceasefire or facing other sanctions, including oil prices.
“The seven group members called to Russia to respond similarly by agreeing to the ceasefire on an equal footing and implementing it completely.
They said, in reference to the regional safety of Ukraine: “They have emphasized that any ceasefire must be respected and an affirmation of the need for strong and credible security arrangements to ensure that Ukraine can deter and defend it against any renewed aggressive acts.”
British Foreign Secretary David Lami described a statement as “very good”.
Washington has sought to impose red lines on the language around Ukraine to not harm its talks with Russia and opposed a separate announcement of the so -called Russian shadow fleet, a mysterious shipping network that gives sanctions, with a demand for a more powerful language in China.
In the end, the G7 also agreed to a separate statement of maritime security, including a work squad to treat the shadow fleet, which is led by Canada.
The final statement mentioned the opposition of a group 7 of any unilateral attempts to change the current situation through the Taiwan Strait by force or coercion, a language that is likely to encourage Taipei.
There was controversy over the language regarding Zoza and the Middle East, especially the idea of a two -state solution to the Israeli -Palestinian conflict, something that the United States was resisting.
The final version did not mention any solution from the two countries, as it emphasized a language that stressed its importance in the previous drafts of the text.
“They stressed the necessity of the political horizon of the Palestinian people, which by resolving negotiations for the Israeli -Palestinian conflict that meets the legitimate needs and aspirations of both peoples and comprehensive progress of peace, comprehensive stability and prosperity.”
– With additional files from Global News and Reuters
https://globalnews.ca/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/3aa49aa0f412cb4f1531a00ed6b5117d8fe336945eab1ccd6851dd408ce24e5f.jpg?quality=85&strip=all&w=720&h=379&crop=1
Source link