A prominent international law firmPresident Donald TrumpOn Friday, to devote at least $ 100 million in free legal services and review their employment practices, and to avoid an executive order to punish such a mentor towards nearly half of the decorations of other major legal institutions in recent weeks.
The deal was announced with Skadden, ARPS, Slate and Meagher & Flom a few hours after a lawsuit against two lawyers in the Federal Court regarding executive orders threatened to suspend the security of their lawyers’ security permits and their arrival at federal buildings. On Friday evening, the judges have banned the application of the main parts of the executive orders against those companies, Wilmeerhale and Jenner & roadblock.
The contradictory approaches reflect the divisions within the legal community about whether the fighting or negotiation will be held as Trump seeks to extract great concessions from some of the most important law firms in the world, and in some cases he punished them for their association with the public prosecutors who previously achieved. Besides Skadden Arps, another company,Paul WeissHe reached an agreement with the White House, a deal that prompted a major violent reaction last week from lawyers who said surrender was a bad precedent.
In a letter to his company, Jeremy London, CEO of Skadden Arps, said that the company had recently learned that the Trump administration aims to issue an executive order aimed at its free legal work and its diversifying initiatives, shares and integration.
“When we face this information, we carefully thought about the right track for us, and the answer was not clear. We were deliberate and deliberate in determining the steps that we might take, knowing that the decisions that we wrestle with will have basic consequences for our company,” London wrote in the letter, which the Associated Press obtained.
He added that the company chose to enter negotiations with the administration in the hope that it would prevent the issuance of an executive order.
“We concluded the agreement announced by the president today because when we faced alternatives, it became clear that it was the best way to protect our customers, our employees and our company,” he wrote.
As part of the deal, Skaden Arps agreed, among other things, to provide at least $ 100 million in free legal services related to reasons, including old warriors affairs and combating anti -Semitism. She also pledged to adhere to the merit -based employment and the use of an independent advisor to ensure that legal employment practices and do not depend on considerations of diversity, fairness and integration.
The two companies that raised the prosecution on Friday, Jenner, Block and Wilmeril, argued in their complaints that orders are to reach an unprecedented attack on the legal system and represent an unconstitutional form of presidential revenge.
“Our constitution, from top to bottom, prevents the government’s attempts to punish citizens and lawyers based on the agents they represent, the positions they defend, the opinions they express, and the people who are connected with them,” said a complaint from Jenner & Block, at the Federal Court in Washington.
After the arguments on Friday, two different federal judges in Washington granted temporary restrictions that companies have requested to prevent the enforcement of the main parts of, which deals with access to federal buildings and government contracts. The American boycott judge, Richard Lyon, the ruling in the Welterlhal case, said that the company “faces more than economic harm – it faces broken losses and its stay at stake.”
“We appreciate the quick procedure for the court to preserve the right of our customers to advise and recognize the unconstitutional nature of the executive matter and its volatile impact on the legal system. The court’s decision to prevent the main rulings of the matter highlight the rights of the first amendment to our customers.”
The companies argued that the executive orders, which were issued earlier this week, had already affected their work, as Jenner & Block said that one customer was notified by the Ministry of Justice that the company could not attend a meeting coming in the building.
“Therefore, this customer will need either to attend the meeting without an external lawyer, or he will need to keep a new foreign lawyer before April 3,” the lawsuit says.
Wilmeerhale’s complaint raises similar concerns, describing a flagrant violation of the company’s rights.
“It imposes severe consequences without notice or any opportunity to listen to it; it uses a mysterious and expanding language that is not known and adequately elaborated (or its clients), which raised these unusual penalties, as the law says unfairly on Wilmergil based on its perceived links to individuals and the reasons for delegated.”
The targeted law firms have taken various curricula for executive orders that threaten to raise their business model and the coldness of their legal practice.
Earlier this month,Perkins Koy’s law firmTrump’s order also stabbed the court and succeeded in obtaining a judge to penetrate its penetration. In contrast to Paul Weiss, in contrast to that,Cut a deal with the White HouseDays after she was subjected to an executive order, its president says that the matter presented a “existential crisis” to the company and that it was not sure that he could have survived a long battle with the Trump administration.
The executive matter against Jenner & Block this week arises from the fact that the company was once hired Andrew Weissman, the lawyer who servedPrivate Lawyer Robert Muller teamThis investigation into Trump during his first term in office due to the possible links between his 2016 campaign and Russia. Weissmann, the repeated general goal of Trump’s inconvenience, left the company several years ago.
Muller retired from Wilmerhale, but the executive order for the White House from Thursday reminds him of his retired partner and a current partner who served all of the Mueler team.
“While most of the litigation requires discovery to discover the revenge motivation, it does not hide any intention to punish Wilmour for his past and current representation of customers before the country’s courts and his perceived relationship with the opinions expressed by Mr. Muller as a special advisor.”
Kovington and Berling’s first executive targetedA company that presented a legal representation of Special Chancellor Jacques Smith, who was achieved in Trump during the Biden administration and presented two separate criminal cases that were abandoned after Trump’s victory in the November elections.
This story was originally shown on Fortune.com
https://fortune.com/img-assets/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/AP25079741888332-e1743256482122.jpg?resize=1200,600
Source link