The FCC’s attempt to restore net neutrality was unsuccessful

Photo of author

By [email protected]


The US Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit ruled yesterday that the FCC. no They have the “legal authority” to implement net neutrality rules.

Since setting the rules in 2015, the FCC has said that classifying ISPs as “telecommunications services” gives it broad authority to regulate them. The decision to redefine ISPs as “information services” during the first Trump administration led to the repeal of net neutrality in 2017.

The current FCC voted to restore net neutrality on April 25 of last year. The difference between 2015 and now is a recent radical reinterpretation by the Supreme Court of an important legal principle. The Chevron Doctrine states that if Congress does not intervene in a case, the courts are supposed to defer to government agencies’ interpretation. Now, interpretation rests with the individual judge, and the Sixth Circuit disagrees with the FCC.

This is the end of the road for the FCC’s attempts. A little bit of power From ISPs, carriers, level of speeds and access regardless of service. Net neutrality rules would still be in place in California and other states, but anything at the federal level would require either a congressional resolution or, in this case, an appeal to (and success before) the Supreme Court.

– Matt Smith

Get this delivered daily straight to your inbox. Subscribe here!

The biggest tech stories you missed

DoneDone

Tesla

Tesla delivered about 1.78 million vehicles in 2024, but the company delivered 1.81 million total in 2023. The company’s shares fell as much as seven percent on the news, but have since risen a few points. This follows similar news from Q1 2024, but that was only for one quarter. Tesla doesn’t release actual sales numbers in the United States, but the numbers are down in Europe, with a 14 percent drop in 2024 compared to last year, according to the European Automobile Manufacturers Association.

Continue reading.

Apple will settle a five-year-old class action lawsuit over Siri privacy. Reuters The company has reportedly agreed to pay $95 million to members of the class, which is estimated to number in the tens of millions of Siri-enabled device owners. The lawsuit stemmed from a 2019 report that Apple’s quality control contractors could regularly hear sensitive information being accidentally recorded by the voice assistant’s “Hey Siri” feature. The clips were said to include medical information, criminal activities and even “sexual encounters.” Reuters He notes that $95 million in cash equates to about nine hours of profit for the company. If you owned a Siri-enabled mobile product during that period (and Judge White approved the settlement), you could get $20 per device.

Continue reading.

DoneDone

time

42 years agolong before Time magazine awarded it “You,” or groups of scientists or even women (gasp!) gave PC the “Man of the Year” award. Time Publisher John A. Myers: “Many human candidates may have represented the year 1982, but none of them symbolizes the past year more richly, or will be viewed by history as more important, than the machine: the computer.”



https://s.yimg.com/ny/api/res/1.2/xXpRE_tuS8GR_PFzWYIs7A–/YXBwaWQ9aGlnaGxhbmRlcjt3PTEyMDA7aD03NjI-/https://s.yimg.com/os/creatr-uploaded-images/2024-08/37c95d10-50b9-11ef-bf6d-3f906878d46c

Source link

Leave a Comment