The creator of James Bond wrote a scenario for the richest movie

There is a moment in “Live and Let Die” that fully determines the Roger Moore tone like James Bond. He left to die on an island in the middle A blessing full of hungry crocodilesMoore 007 escapes by using three deadly reptiles as a step stones to safety, barely wet his feet in this process. There is a lot where that came, including a barrel jumping barrel in “The Man with Gold Gun”, Blofeld was thrown below a smoker in “for your eyes only”, and a skating scene on Beach Boys in “view of killing”. But maybe there is no movie in Moore, it is ridiculous like “Moonraker”.

advertisement

After the success of the “spy who loved me”, the upcoming Moore adventure was supposed to be “for your eyes only.” (Even there is a joke “James Bond will return …” in the final credits of the previous film.) Cubby Broccoli has decided that Eon Productions should also follow its example to keep pace with competition and turned into the most popular Bond Ian Feneng novel, “Moonraker”, to get inspiration.

This time, Bond was deviating from the plan to thwart the evil plans of one of Hugo Drax (Michael Lonsale), an industrialist aimed at wiping everyone on Earth from his space station and creating a major race. Since this was not ridiculous enough, the jaws (Richard Keel) also returned from the previous movie and got a friend, and there were many moments like a double bathroom in the Gondola Venice chase. However, the audience ate, and “Moonraker” became the most profitable movie “Goldneye” in 1995.

advertisement

Despite its success, “Moonraker” is considered as One of the worst bond movies (And it is definitely the most hotter). However, it may have been different if Fleming had made his way. Before his death in 1964, the author wrote a cinematic treatment based on his original novel. It was considered lost for about 50 years before appearing in 2015 and was sold at a public auction to a special bidding. Details are scarce, but it is safe to say that it was closer to the novel “Moonraker” than the movie “Movie Confation” of 1979. This is what we know.

“Moonraker” was James Bond’s third novel by Ian Fleming, and despite the title, it is a story related to the ground. James Bond was fully appointed in Britain, who was appointed to investigate Hugo Drax, a respected industrial and a former British war champion. Drax Technology Nazi V2 Rocket is used to develop the Moonraker program, which is designed to protect the country from incoming attacks. In the end, Bond discovers that Drax is actually a former Nazi scientist working for the Soviet Union and plans to arm his missile with nuclear warheads to destroy London.

advertisement

“Moonraker” was published in 1955, in painful memories of V1 missile attacks on the English capital during World War II and the increasing fears of nuclear annihilation with the escalation of Cold War tensions. These concerns were very real for the public because the atomic destruction of Hiroshima and Nagasaki 10 years ago were still new in the minds of many people. The novel was received as an amazing wonderful contemplation of the decline in the British Empire, as well as what the nation will lose if a catastrophic conflict briefly erupted after another. Fleming’s development of the Pond character was indicated while Drax was also praised as one of the most valuable bonds (one with the equivalent in the real world who presented a real threat). Some fans were not very happy, and they were disappointed because there were no strange sites and fled to British readers who rarely see destinations that exceed their beaches in real life.

advertisement

Although some are “Moonraker” masterpiece masterpiece, Cubby Broccoli was not very excited. Even after Eon Productions used it to benefit from it in the “Star Wars” phenomenon, the book’s plot was rejected as a “small small missile that was ascending to destroy London.” It is clear that the range needs to be greater for an international group. The Christopher Wood scenario took only the title and basic elements of the Fellang story before expanding it to include space stations and global genocide by Drax, which has become a more standard evil villain with designs for controlling the world.

Ian Fleming wrote from the experience when James Bond created, drawing from his direct knowledge of British intelligence during World War II. He was considered a spying of “dirty trade” and his most famous personality, accordingly, was courageous, a cold heart fought, which was the tendency to the most amazing things in life as a conditioner in a profession in which he might meet an ugly end at any moment. In short, Fellang 007 could not be more different from taking lukewarm Roger.

advertisement

“Moonraker” depicts as a novel that will eventually find its way to cinemas and wrote his 150 -page treatment a year after the book was published. With “dr. no”, the first adaptation on the big screen is still six years away, the details indicate that it was a much low relationship from the relatively basic Chun Connery adventures. It was the only attempt for Fleming in a scenario, and John Gilbert, an expert Feling, indicated that he was somewhat heavy on prose and “more dangerous” than the 1979 movie.

The main differences of the privilege we know and love include the absence of M and Miss Moneypenny. The commander is presented in Bond as a genetic civil employee, and perhaps more like the heads of the secret service that Fleming has known during his period in marine intelligence. The jaws are not anywhere to be seen: Richard Kiel’s followers of steel Horowitz looked like a reward called Sol “Horror” in the subsequent Fleming novel “The Spy who loved me.” There was another insertion in the Veling scenario that is a completely new character called TOSH, a special agent working in a secret condition like a kokni card.

advertisement

One of the details that the Bond fan will have a choice of 007 for swimming clothes. Like Sean Connery and Daniel Craig, Fleming Bond Bond Shorts is wearing light blue shorts while retreating from the Kent coast. With the discovery of Fleming and the ongoing rumors about the direction that the bond privilege may take in the future, it raises an interesting question: Can we one day restart “Moonraker” closer to how to imagine its author originally?