The British Supreme Court controls the legal definition of a “woman” that excludes women’s transit identities

On Wednesday, the UK’s Supreme Court upheld an appeal from the campaign of the campaign for Scotland women on whether sexually transgender women are legally under equality legislation, but said that converts would not be deprived of their historical decision.

The ruling unanimously from five judges from the Supreme Court related to whether a passing woman has a certificate of gender recognition (GRC), an official document that gives legal recognition of a person’s sex type, protected from discrimination as a woman under the Equality Law in Britain.

For women, Scotland argued with rights under the Equality Law, it should only apply on the basis of the person appointed to a person at birth. The directives issued by the Scottish government that accompanied the 2018 Law have defied a designer to increase the percentage of women in public sector councils.

Scottish ministers on this law stated that a complete GRC woman was a legal woman.

Patrick Hodge, Vice President of the Supreme Court, said: “The terms” women “and” sex “in the 2010 Equality Law indicate a biological woman and biological sex, but we recommend reading this ruling as a victory for one or more group in our society at the expense of another. It is not.”

Critics of the Scottish law said that its definition may affect one sex services for women, such as shelters, hospital and sports suites.

However, the transgender activists said if the court had ruled in favor of Scotland women, this may lead to discrimination against those who have gender recognition certificates, especially because of employment cases.

Hodge said that the interpretation of the Equality Law “does not deprive the converts, whether they have a certificate of sex recognition or not.”

He said: “Persons with transformers have the rights attached to the reserve feature of the gender reset.”

The opponents, including Amnesty International, with the exception of transgender people from protecting sexual discrimination that contradicts human rights laws.

Amnesty briefly presented in the court saying it was concerned about the deterioration of the rights of converting persons in the UK and abroad.

The Human Rights Group said: “A comprehensive policy is to prevent transit women from single sex services is not a proportional way to achieve a legitimate goal.”

Read the Supreme Court in the United Kingdom: