The Arkansas judge says the social media verification law, it violates the first amendment

A judge in Arkansas closed the state law, which requires some social networks to verify the ages of those in the state to create an account and ensure that the palace has permission for parents. Judge Timothy spent. Broks said that the law, which was called the Social media safety law, was so wide that it violated the first amendment rights for Internet users and was very mysterious, and it was unclear social networks that the law would cover.

“Arkansas takes over the adults” and the protected rhetoric “alike opinion Monday.

Located all over the United States and abroad has sought to protect the palace from the long -term damage caused by social media, and to reach smartphones. Utah recently Law passed This requires Apple and Google application stores to check users’ ages before they can download applications and requires minors to have accounts connected to their parents. Meta was in support of this law because it put responsibility for other companies to verify users; He was opposed to Arkansas. The states and educational provinces throughout the country also implement laws that prevent students from reaching their phones during the school day to eliminate deviations and combat bullying.

While social media has been linked to an increase in the mental health risks of adolescents, many adolescents I mentioned benefits To use services, such as finding similar societies in thinking where they feel belonging. Moreover, critics of the laws to identify laws despite the presence of risks to minors who use social media, these types of laws violate the right of each person to privacy-in states such as Florida and Texas, as laws that require porn sites to verify the ages of users have passed, and served major services including porn. close Instead of making users deliver personal identification information. In an era in which the White House is ready to take revenge on individuals because of their free expression, the risks of asking users to verify their identities are clear.

“Instead of targeting the harmful content of minors, ACT 689 (social media safety) simply hinders access to the great content order,” said Brooks.

No effectively there are no federal laws related to Internet platforms, with the collapse of 23andme, which highlights the problem. It was recently announced that as part of the DNA testing company and genetic data from customers It can be soldIt is possible that it is used against individuals.

Judge Brocks also pointed out that the law was very mysterious, noting that the state prosecutor believed that Snapchat had been exempt from the requirements, while the sponsorship of the participating law believed that it was covered.

“I respect the court’s decision, and we are evaluating our options,” Public Prosecutor Tim Griffin said in a statement.

Social media companies have continued to implement tools to combat bullying, such as allowing users to restrict others’ access to their content. During the Biden Administration, the social networks recommended by the American surgeon must display warning stickers highlighting the potential damage of adolescents, and perhaps redesigning their applications to address problems such as insecurity, which can be caused by beauty candidates and other tools.

Some of those who believe that social media is harmful to adolescents that laws such as age verification and the ban on smartphones during the school day Do not address the actual problem. Teenagers will wander in age tests, and if they cannot use their phones during the school day, they will use them more after the classroom. They argue that these laws do not deal with the root cause, which is the designed design of social media applications.