The American judge wants to explain why the Trump administration deported the Venezuelan amid the court order

On Monday, a federal judge pressed the Trump administration to provide details about the hundreds of Venezuelans who were deported despite the court’s order to prohibit it, and gave the government until Tuesday to explain the reason for the officials believe that they had complied with his matter.

US President Donald Trump’s administration More than 200 Fenzueli has been deported It is claimed that members of Treen de Aragoa, a Venezuelan gang associated with kidnapping, extortion and killings, to El Salvador during the weekend, even when Judge James Pasperg temporarily prevented the use of the War Time Law to carry out the deportation.

Boasberg had previously ordered the government to provide details about the timing of flights that transferred the Venezuelan to El Salvador, including whether it was taking off after issuing his order.

The government lawyer disturbed the administration during a hearing on Monday.

“Why do you appear today without answers?” Paspurg request.

The session followed a request from the government to remove the judge from the case. The Trump administration has challenged historical checks and balances between US government branches.

Since he took office in January, Trump has sought to push the borders of the executive authority, reduce the spending borrowed by Congress, dismantle agencies and shoot thousands of federal workers.

Emergency session on the weekend

He defended a session on Monday through an emergency hearing on Saturday, when the American Civil Liberties Union asked Boasberg to issue a two -week temporary bloc on Trump Using the law of foreign enemies From 1798 to carry out deportations.

The White House confirmed on Sunday that federal courts have no jurisdiction over Trump’s authority to expel foreign enemies under the eighteenth century law, which is used historically only in wartime, although it also said it had complied with the matter.

In the court file shortly before the Monday session, the Trump administration said that the spoken guidance of the judge on Saturday to return any aircraft carrying immigrants was “implemented” because it was not in a written order.

The administration said it does not violate the written matter in Pasperj, which prevents immigration authorities from removing migrants because the planes had already left when they were issued.

But the judge said in the court that he still wanted to know when he left flights, where they were going, and when they left the American airspace and when they landed in a foreign country. He also asked when individuals were transferred to foreign nursery.

“There is a lot of operational national security and foreign relations at risk,” said Abhishek Campley, a lawyer for the Ministry of Justice.

Boasberg ordered the government by noon on Tuesday to provide details such as the timing of flights and expatriates in foreign countries, and the number of people who were deported and why the government did not believe it could make this information public.

Boasberg did not mention whether the government violates its orders from Saturday.

The judge was sometimes skeptical of the Trump administration’s logical basis for not returning the aircraft to the United States, which has repeatedly pressed them in Campley, who has repeatedly said that there were issues that he could not publicly share.

“Borders on the absurdity”

Some legal experts said that the location of the plane in the air is not related.

Michael J. said. Gerahardt, a professor of constitutional law at the Faculty of Law at North Carolina University, said that the argument of “borders is tampering” and was “a well -settly constitutional law” stipulating that federal officials are subject to the constitution regardless of their whereabouts.

“If this is not the case, the government can simply do anything it seems to do as long as it is no longer working anymore on the American soil.”.

With the support of the Republican -dominated Congress from its agenda, Federal judges were often the only restriction of its executive actions, which hinders many while considering their legitimacy. In some cases, the calling groups said that the administration refuses to comply with judicial orders.

The Trump administration described various Venezuelan who were deported as gang members, “monsters”, or “foreign terrorists”, but they did not provide evidence to support its assurances.

White House press secretary Caroline Levit said that there are 261 people who were deported in total, including 137 they were removed under the Law of Foreign Enemies and more than 100 other people were removed through standard immigration procedures. Levitt said there were 23 members of Salvadori in the MS-13 gang.

The Trump administration also found itself defending its actions in deporting the doctor of Rod Island to Lebanon last week.

The American authorities said on Monday that they had deported Dr. Rasha Aywai after the discovery of “sympathetic photos and videos” from the former leader of Hezbollah and the militants in the folder deleted with her mobile phone.

Alawieh also told the agents that in Lebanon she attended the funeral last month Hezbollah leader Hassan NasrallahShe supported her from a “religious perspective” as a Shiite Muslim.

The Justice Department provided these details and sought to guarantee a federal judge in Boston that the protection of customs and the protection of the American border did not intentionally dismissed an order issued on Friday that should have stopped the immediate removal of Alwoya.