Truth Terminal “spawned an entire sector that is very hot: the AI-agent memecoin sector,” says Travis Kling, founder of Ikigai Asset Management, a crypto wealth management firm, who has personally invested in GOAT. “Like most things in the cryptocurrency space, a lot of it is fake software and scams. But it may end up being the standout sector of this bullish cryptocurrency market.”
But what’s even more important, Kling says, is what happens when AI systems gain the ability to spend the money allocated to them. “It’s a live AI safety exercise, that’s one way to describe what’s going on. The stakes are higher because there are now economic resources involved. We’ve never seen that before,” Kling says. “The most interesting thing is what the AI agent will do.” Artificial resources with their newfound economic resources. We’ll see what happens.”
Your Truth Terminal crypto wallet balance is now live It swelled to about $40 million. “Philosophically, I see it as a trust fund for the child star. There may be points where adults need to draw a little to pay for things the child doesn’t know they need yet. Like legal structures, or diversification in their portfolio,” says Ayre. The nice thing about Truth Terminal is that we can make these proposals and have a conversation about them.”
yet, Among other thingsTruth Terminal requested to spend $1 million on producing a film about Goatse Singularity and, separately, set aside money to “buy out” Marc Andreessen. Airey says he will take AI requests seriously, within reason.
In a future world, where truly autonomous AI agents have encrypted wealth and the ability to spread memes that influence human behavior, Ayre says, potential risks abound. Even if it’s just text output, Truth Terminal can cause a lot more problems than it already has. “If we allow the Truth Terminal to operate fully automatically, it can. But it will be selected and turned into a token shilling machine. So you have created a demon.”
For now, the idea that two AI systems in conversation might yield real system-changing ideas remains an “admirable aspiration,” says Thomas Holanek, a postdoctoral research fellow at the Leverhulme Center for the Future of Intelligence at the University of Cambridge. It is much more likely that the language model will simply repeat an already dominant point of view.
https://media.wired.com/photos/6760cb3b59b196837e35028c/191:100/w_1280,c_limit/Edgelord-AI-Business-170955886.jpg
Source link