Taylor Swift “was not happy” about his withdrawal in the Leville legal warfare

It is rumored that the situation has strained the friend of the singer who dates back to a decade with the actress, as Swift cleared the “Gossip Girl” star in her guest list in Superbowl 2025.

Blake Livly and her husband, Ryan ReynoldsSince then, she has secured a preventive order to keep their talks with “prominent” people secret amid the legal battle with Baldouni.

Swift is less than his happiness from his jar to the ongoing legal battle between Lively and Baldoni.

Lively, who was a friend of the “empty space” for more than 10 years, filed a lawsuit accused of inferior sexual harassment on a group of Colin Hoover’s book.

Baldouni denied the allegations at that time and provided a 400 million dollar suit, accusing Livly and her husband, Reynolds, and their propaganda Leslie Sloan, by managing a campaign of distortion against him.

He also claimed vital and her husband tried to kidnap the movie from him using the position of celebrities.

Swift was eventually named after the case after she claimed that she referred to herself in the name of Khalisi from the “Game of Thrones” and referred to Reynolds and Swift in the name of “dragte” in an alleged attempt to force him to accept the amendments she made to the scene of the distinctive surface now in the movie.

A source said US weekly The global bobstar was “not happy with the existence of legal chaos.”

However, the source claimed that “there is no fact that this has damaged his relationship,” adding that they are “still close friends.”

While the actual state of a quick and vital relationship is still unclear, a source said TMZ The singer “relax” is vitality in order to “describe it as one of her tears.”

They added that the 14 -time -old crime winner was suffering from an alleged meeting with Livly and Badouni.

The source claimed that Swift came to the Levli apartment when the actress told her and “she has no idea” that Balmouni will be there.

Among other things, they also made it clear that the singer believes that her meeting is “time” for the Ballado, so Swift will arrive before leaving.

The insiders also noticed that Swift was “confusing” by describing it “dragon”, noting: “It is strange to say this about a friend.”

Swift has also learned that Lively was “inappropriately benefiting from her name for a long time, such as telling a young actress that Taylor” threw her “, which did not simply.”

After he revealed that he felt pressed by Swift and Rynolds during his meeting with Livly, he told a source close to Swift Daily Mail The pop star left “disorganized”.

“You find Justin’s interpretation of the puzzling confrontation, and those close to a suspect that they are attracted to the situation as a way to target Blake,” said the news outlet.

They pointed out: “Taylor is proud of the movie because her music appeared in it, which gave her a feeling of participation, although she was not fully aware of the development of the project.”

The insiders emphasized that Swift’s relationship with vitality is “a purely friendship, without any interest in influencing or controlling Blake’s projects.”

The source shared that the first group of potential witnesses that the Baldouni team wanted to have been contacted, including Swift, “It ends with us” Jenny Slit and Isabella Ferrier, the chief employee of the WME talent agency, which represents vitality, and the CEO of Sony.

This comes as a judge who gives a vital request and Rynolds to put a preventive order on contacts and sensitive documents with their celebrities.

The couple applied to keep their conversations with the “prominent” people, fearing that they would be inferred to the press.

However, this was not a full victory for them, as Judge Luis Lehman spent the request “partially granted and partially exiled.”

Judge Leman wrote in a memo that “the court has narrowed the ruling that he mentioned that it is not permissible to distinguish information unless it is very likely that it will cause an important, commercial, financial or privacy injury.” New York Post.

Amid the legal confrontation, Swift remained significantly silent on issues and did not address the situation publicly.

Before the trial scheduled for 2026, legal experts participated that her continuous silence “talks about volumes.”

“Taylor has publicly distanced from this – and I get the reason. You are likely to hope to stay out of chaos completely.” Fox News. “But this is not a reality.

“It appears to be in line with Hollywood players – this distorts the image of the” good girl “that many of her fans have withstood,” she added.

“People remain quiet strategically for many reasons, and certainly, some stars only want to avoid journalism-I respect that. But for someone who feeds on the media such as Taylor Swift to stay outside this? Who talks about volumes. Frankly, we want to hear her side.”