Some Israelis prefer to attack Iran, expressing doubts about the talks

In the past, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has included the three main threats facing Israel, “Iran, Iran and Iran.” He greatly climbed his career in Israel’s protector against Iranian nuclear aspirationsHe has publicly Tehran faced In recent months, he is in war with Iran -backed militias around the region.

Therefore, many Israelis were surprised when President Trump announced, with Mr. Netanyahu’s sitting next to him, on Monday that the United States You will participate in “direct” negotiations With Iran on Saturday, in another effort to curb the country’s nuclear program.

Mr. Trump’s statement was sprayed Front pages One of the main newspapers in Israel on Tuesday morning. With the passage of today, critics were increasingly weighing, and the pros and cons of unexpected development.

By early evening in Israel, Mr. Netanyahu issued a video statement before his departure from Washington, where he sought greatly to confirm his close alliance and align with the Trump administration.

“We agree that Iran will not have nuclear weapons,” he said. He explained that this means the destruction of the vast nuclear program for Iran, the bombing of facilities and the dismantling of all equipment, all of which are implemented by the United States.

Mr. Netanyahu said that in the event of Iran’s talks, the second option will be a military choice. He said, “Everyone understands this,” adding, “We discussed it with eternity.”

With the Iranian nuclear program is considered In its most advanced phase Ever before, some Israeli experts suggested that it be the perfect time to attack the nuclear facilities of Branan. Iran’s traditional allies on the borders of Israel are either weakened, in the case of Hezbollah in Lebanon; Or fell in case Assad’s system In Syria. This means that any attack can benefit from Tehran’s weakness yet Israeli strikes in the fall I took out air defenses on the main nuclear sites.

If there are direct talks, it will be the first official and face negotiations between the two countries since Mr. Trump Abandoning the nuclear agreement Obama era Seven years ago, at the request of Mr. Netanyahu, who condemned him as a “bad deal”.

“This will be a good thing.”

Many Israelis will agree.

“The ideal of Israel will be a very good agreement.” He said he hoped that Mr. Trump’s approach will be “more aggressive” than the approach of previous administrations in dealing with Iran.

Mr. Josensky added, “But there is nothing perfect in the world,” expressing his widespread fears that Mr. Trump “may be ready to be more flexible than Israel will” and that the gap may open about the issue between Israel and Washington.

Mr. Josensky said that the interests of the two sides are already different, as Israel is located near Iran and it has to live with its agents on its borders, while the United States is thousands of miles away and has other urgent problems. He said he hoped that Mr. Netanyahu will continue to obtain the Ear of the Trump administration and that Israel will remain in the picture.

Some Israeli analysts were suffering from failure in any such talks, noting that the Iranians were harsh negotiations.

Many took condolences in Mr. Trump’s statement that Tehran would be “in great danger” if it fails to reach an agreement and pointed to reports that the Pentagon recently published at least six B-2 bombers to the island of Diego Garcia in the Indian Ocean as concrete evidence of a military option against Iran.

“There is no opportunity for Ayatollah to agree on dictates,” said Ariel Kahna, the diplomatic commentator of Israel, a right -wing newspaper, on Tuesday, expected to impose the Trump administration on the difficult circumstances on Iran for an agreement.

So, “Mr. Kahna continued,” A military clash with Iran is only a matter of time. “