Sir Philip Green failed in an attempt to challenge the parliamentary concession

Digest opened free editor

Rola Khaleda, FT editor, chooses her favorite stories in this weekly newsletter.

Sir Philip Green failed in his attempt to challenge the use of the British parliamentary concession, which was used in the House of Lords to connect the former Topshop owner with allegations of sexual misconduct in 2018.

Green, who lives in Monaco, submitted a privacy complaint to the European Court of Human Rights, which could undermine the ability of British and peer representatives to use their parliamentary privilege to reveal the secret details that are subject to a judicial order.

In 2018, the Lord Hayne Hine Council was used as the parliamentary concession, for example green He also accused the businessman of trying to use unveiling agreements to silence the employees who accused him of sexual harassment and bullying. Green denied allegations.

In the ruling on Tuesday morning, the European Court unanimously found that the United Kingdom had not violated the European Conference on Human Rights, and avoided controversial intervention in the rights of the British Parliament by the judges in Strasbourg.

The court has found that it should be left to individual states and parliament in the United Kingdom in particular, to take a decision on the controls required to prevent parliamentarians from revealing information subject to privacy orders.

He added, “To find otherwise, it would contradict the principle of the independence of Parliament, which has already looked and rejected the need for more controls.”

Green did not immediately respond to a request for comment.