Russia is tested by patience, Trump is rushing to the peace agreement Ukraine

It is about to determine the 100 tone^Y On the day of his second administration at the end of April, US President Donald Trump increased Russia and Ukraine to end their three -year conflict at a sharp price for regional excellence.

The US special envoy Steve Witkeov, a former real estate pole that turned into Carmelin Wespress, arrived in Moscow on Friday, according to Infax. He is expected to make more peace talks with Russian President Vladimir Putin-whom he met three times-in a fragile time in Moscow’s ties, which has only melted since Trump returned in January to the White House.

The Kremlin so far have contacted Ukraine negotiations, which are sponsored by the United States-which led to a partial ceasefire and inlaid on the energy infrastructure last month-with a friendly contract, and avoid the integration that Trump directed to a large extent to a large-scale leadership to his frequency throughout the talks and the absence of a security guarantee issued. Washington leader has repeatedly summoned his Ukrainian counterpart Folodimir Zellinski to ignore him in his appreciation in both conflict and discussions, as well as – earlier this week – ignores the possibility of abandoning the Crimea.

But the intensification of Russian attacks against Kiev earlier this week after a calm on the Easter holiday Take a rare shot Against Putin on Thursday.

“I am not happy with Russian strikes on Kiev,” Trump wrote on the social media platform.

“It is not necessary, and a very bad timing,” the White House leader added. “Vladimir, stop!”

“I didn’t like last night, I was not happy with it,” Trump said at a separate press conference. “We put a lot of pressure on Russia, and Russia knows it.”

Trump’s frustration of the US -led diplomatic efforts that Washington have indicated may be close to giving up. On Wednesday, intended talks were reduced in London between the United Kingdom, French, German, Ukrainian and US officials after the withdrawal of US Secretary of State Marco Rubio and private envoys.

“We have issued a very clear proposal for both the Russians and the Ukrainians, and it is time for them to either say” yes “or the United States to stay away from this process,” said US Vice President JD Vance earlier.

The silhouette of the United States’s final peace show is still out of reach, though Axios reports The last framework provides a Russian framework for the American recognition of the occupation of Crimea in Moscow, the lifting of the sanctions imposed since 2014 and the abandonment of Ukraine for ambitions to join the NATO military alliance-a long critical goal that was called as a Carmlin as the proof of his invasion in 2022.

On the other hand, Ukraine will secure a desirable security guarantee against more Russian incursions, which is part of the Kharkif-one of four of Russia in the three-year conflict-and aid for reconstruction.

CNBC could not confirm the frameworks of the frame independently and have communicated with the White House to comment.

If they embody, the framework conditions mean a flagrant shift in the dialect of Ukraine, whose leadership has continued to constantly exclude regional concessions.

And Vans indicated earlier this week that peace requires “a wide level of parties, saying: We will stop killing, and we will freeze the regional lines at a level near the place they are today.”

He explained, “The current lines, somewhere near them, are the place where you are in the end, I think it will lead to drawing lines in the conflict. Now, of course, this means that the Ukrainians and the Russians alike will have to give some of the lands they currently own. They will have to be some regional biases.”

This week, Zelinski returned to the idea of ​​handing over sovereign lands, saying categorically, according to a translation, that “Ukraine does not recognize the law of the Crimea. There is nothing we are talking about. It is outside our constitution.”

But the upper copper in Ukraine seems reluctantly open to the possibility:

“In one of the scenarios, what you say, to give up the lands. It is not justice but for peace, temporary peace, maybe (A) can be a temporary solution,” said Kiev Vitaly’s Mayor Klitschko in a TV interview with BBC News.