Written by Max A. Indicate
SANTISCO (Reuters) – Intel CEO lip lip lip lip lip lipstick looked at important changes in the manufacture of chips and artificial intelligence strategies before returning to the company on Tuesday, two people who are familiar with Tan’s thinking, in a comprehensive attempt to revive the deadly technology giant.
The new path includes the restructuring of the company’s approach to artificial intelligence and discount employees to handle TAN views as the slow and enlarged middle management class. These sources said that the company’s manufacturing operations, which were only made of Intel chips but were reused to make semiconductors for external customers such as NVIDIA, is one of the basic priorities of Tan.
At a meeting in the city hall after his appointment as CEO last week, the employees told that the company would need “difficult decisions”, according to two other people who were briefed on the meeting.
Dylan Patel, an expert in conductor Dylan Patel, said that a major problem during the era of the former CEO of Intel, Pat Gilgringer, who left the company in December, was “very nice.” “He did not want to launch a group of middle administration the way they needed,” he said.
Tan, 65, was the former CEO of the Chip Cadence and Tech Investor, a member of the Intel Board of Directors until last August. On his return as an executive head, Tan is scheduled to take over an American icon after a decade of bad decisions made by three executives, as it failed to build chips for smartphones and lost the demand for artificial intelligence treatments, allowing competitors with arms and Nvidia to control these markets.
Intel recorded an annual loss of $ 19 billion in 2024, the first since 1986.
In the short term, Tan aims to improve performance in its manufacturing arm, Intel Foundry, which makes chips for other design companies such as Microsoft and Amazon, by attracting new customers strongly, according to the people.
It will also restart plans to produce chips that operate artificial intelligence servers and look into areas that exceed servers in many areas such as programs, robots and AI’s models.
“Lip-B will spend a lot of time to listen to customers, partners and employees, where he comes on board and works closely with our leadership team to work for success in the future.”
Intel refused to comment more or provide Tan to conduct an interview. Tan adventure company, parents of Complest, did not respond to the comment requests.
Initially, Tan’s strategy appears to be a polishing of gelsiner. The axis of GELSINSER’s transformation plan was to convert Intel to a contracting chips manufacturer that would compete with the semiconductor manufacturer in Taiwan, or TSMC, which calculates Apple, NVIDIA and Qualcomm as customers.
Gelsiner committed tens of billions of dollars to build factories in the United States and Europe to make chips for both Intel and external customers, but he had to expand the scope of these aspirations as the Intel basic products market was cooled.
Bet on artificial intelligence
Tan was an internal critic of the execution of Geelsiner, according to exporters familiar with TAN plans.
For most of its history, Intel made chips for only one customer – himself. When Gelsiner became the CEO of 2021, he gave priority to manufacturing chips to others, but he did not say about providing the level of technical service and technical service as a TSMC competitor, which led to failed delays and tests.
Tan’s views were formed months than reviewing the Intel manufacturing process after the council appointed it in late 2023 for a special role that supervises it, according to the provision of an organizational file.
In his evaluation, he expressed his frustration with the company’s culture. Reuters reported that there is a belief that decision -making was slowed by an enlarged operating force.
Tan presented some of his ideas to the Intel Board of Directors last year, but they refused to put them in place, according to two people familiar with this issue. By August, Tan suddenly resigned from the difference with the council, Reuters said.
When he returned as an executive this week, he will put new eyes on the workforce in Intel, which was reduced by about 15,000 to nearly 109,000 at the end of last year, the sources said.
Besides the discounts, Tan has a big option but to make the current manufacturing process of Intel operating in the short term. The next generation of the advanced Intel chips equipped with the features of artificial intelligence, called Panther Lake, depends on its internal factories using a new set of technologies and technologies called Intel 18A.
The financial success of Intel this year is related to strong sales of the upcoming chip.
Tan indicated in the Intel Memorandum, published on Wednesday, that he is planning to control the factories, which are still financially separate, operation of design work and the restoration of Intel as a “global muse”.
The process of manufacturing Intel contracts can succeed if Tan beat at least large customers to produce a large amount of chips.
Part of the efforts made to attract adult customers will include improving the process of manufacturing Intel chips to facilitate the use of potential customers such as NVIDIA and Alphabet’s Google.
Intel has demonstrated improvements in its manufacturing operations in recent weeks and attracted attention from NVIDIA and Broadcom that launched early testing. The advanced small devices also evaluate the Intel process.
Tan is expected to work on ways to improve production or “return” to provide higher numbers of chips printed on each silicone chip as it moves to manufacture in size in its first internal segment using the so -called alleged 18A process this year.
The goal is to move to an annual release schedule of artificial intelligence chips, similar to NVIDIA, but that will take years. It will be at least 2027 before INTEL will develop a convincing new structure for the first artificial intelligence, according to three sources in the industry, and one person familiar with the advancement of Intel.
(Max A. Shirni in San Francisco; Edit by Kenneth Lee and Michael Lermond)
