Prince Harry claims that he was “distinguished” for “lower treatment” in the United Kingdom

prince HarryThe legal team argued that it was “distinguished” for the lower treatment “when its security was reduced based on its decision to stop the upper royal life.

The claim was submitted during the first procedures in the appeal against the reduction of its security by the Executive Committee for the Protection of Kings and Public Numbers (RAVEC).

Meanwhile, the lawyer, who represents the Ministry of Interior, criticized Prince Harry’s decision to appeal as “a continuous failure to see wood for trees,

Prince Harry’s resumption of reducing his security after his royal exit is going well, with his legal team opened the challenge with strong data, for each Daily Mail.

The lawyer of the Duke, the martyr of Fatima KC, argued that Harry “was allocated to the various unjustified and minimal treatment” by the Ministry of the House. A decision was taken to reduce his security through RAVEC in early 2020 after Harry and his wife, Megan Markle, resigned from being the senior worker members.

After urging the case, Fatima KC told the court that Raven did not obtain an evaluation from the risk board before Harry was subjected to a “detailed operation” for his current security arrangement.

It also claimed that this evaluation, which is a major part of the RAVEC operation, has not yet been provided despite the security threats that Harry had recently faced.

Then Fatima KC indicated that the judge who ruled against Harry “failed to estimate the role of RMB analysis (Risk Board of Directors) in making decisions for RAVEC” and was also mistaken in two other aspects of “building and applying the standards of reference and evaluation.”

In response to the strong statements by Prince Harry’s legal team, Sir James Eddie K., who represents the Ministry of Interior, argued that the Duke is no longer qualified for the level of his previous security because “he is no longer a member of the group of individuals whose security center remains under regular review by RAVEC.

He also stated that the judge was “right to find that it is legal” to have the final power to appoint Prince Harry “a detailed security arrangement” against Fatima Kc that the judge “has been incorrectly and incapable to Ravec.”

Eadie Kc also pointed out that Harry’s decision to appeal reflects “a continuous failure to see wood for trees, and promotes the available proposals only by reading small parts of evidence and now the ruling, outside the context and ignoring the overall image.”

Unlike today’s procedures, which were broadcast live, tomorrow’s session will be held behind closed doors.

The decision of the judges, Sir Jeffrey Fos, the Lord Justice Between, and the Roses Justice Edis due to some evidence that is expected to be considered “very secret”.

The referees said: “Some evidence was agreed upon in this case, which is placed before the Court of Appeal, between the parties, provided that it is very secret.” “This evidence relates to security arrangements, threat levels and evaluation of the plaintiff and other general numbers.”

They also claimed that the content content “will be important for anyone who wants to harm a person within the scope of security arrangements.” Hence, allowing tomorrow’s procedures “would effectively risk these arrangements.”

At approximately 9:30 am, Prince Harry arrived at the court of 73rd courts of Justice, which represents his first appearance in the United Kingdom in more than six months.

He was wearing official clothes consisting of a dark suit associated with a white shirt and a pale blue tie.

The Duke arrived in brief security details and provided a simple smile to some of the journalists present to cover the procedures.

He was also met with a question from a correspondent asking whether he had spoken to his father upon his arrival from Los Angeles on Sunday. Harry, however, chose not to respond to the investigation.

Upon entering the courtroom, he occupied his seat in the back of three seats behind his legal team.

As the Duke and Duchess of Sussex continued to live as the mouths of Royals other than work, Megan is said to be a woman who is free to be free from the drama of the courtroom that abandoned him.

Harry was fighting for the Ministry of Interior to re -protect the tax -financing police himself and his family after they were stripped of that when they left their royal duties in 2020.

I told a former archeweell for the couple now People Magazine The previous actress “Claims” supports Harry by 100 percent, but she hopes that he can give up these lawsuits, be happy and live at the present time. “

The source added: “She wants him to be free of all this, but she also knows that because of everything he went through and his love (she and their children), he cannot. She wants him to live in a world in which he does not weigh.”