“Modern Snake Fashion”: The Live Doc shares with Bryan Johnson on “Anti-Vicer” BluePrint

Brian Johnson, an American businessman, is famous for the BluePrint, which includes a plant -based diet, exercise, and a wide range of nutritional supplements.

Johnson claims that his system will reflect biological aging and led to vital signs similar to the 18 -year -old. Now, Dr. Creek Abe Phillips, the liver doctor from Kerala, criticized a public scheme, drawing similarities between Johnson and the famous Mudhalon such as Elizabeth Holmes and Bill Gibson.

Dr. Phillips, known as “The Live Dok”, is accused of Johnson of marketing exaggerated and unjust nutritional supplements. According to Philus, BluePrint is a risky project, free from great scientific support. “It is terrifying that people do not see that Brian Johnson is in fact a good male form of fraudsters Elizabeth Holmes and Bill Gibson, and selling both expensive and completely interesting investigations and toured snake oil supplements that are likely to be dangerous as BluePrint,” said Dr. Philips. ”

In defense, Johnson insists that his products are legitimate, as he stated that all ingredients have “nutrients with independent and powerful scientific evidence.” It also claims that the third party was tested, with the analysis certificates available publicly.

“Blueprint provides excellent virgin olive oil, proteins, nuts, and nutrients that have independent and strong scientific evidence. It has been tested by a third party. Analysis certificates are openly available. They are at reasonable prices.”

However, Dr. Phillips called for clinical evidence and dose details, which claim that Johnson did not provide him.

Dr. Phillips warns that there are no large -scale studies on the integrity of the materials and interaction used in the plans raising additional concerns, Dr. Phillips warns. It also suspends the potential side effects of the reaction of various plant extracts.

Despite these issues, Johnson claims that his personal health improvements are evidence of the effectiveness of the plan, although Dr. Phillips argues that personal tales are not alternatives to scientific evidence.

Johnson, who had previously been involved in disputes over the behavior of the workplace, responded to Dr. Phillips’s criticism with questions about the doctor’s motives, and asked, “Cyriac, why are you very angry? Who hurt you?”

However, Dr. Phillips is still firm, and Johnson is constantly challenging to provide scientific verification of the plan’s demands. Without such evidence, Philips suggests that the program remain speculation and perhaps misleading for consumers.