Menedez Brothers for Freedom, the rules of the judge can continue

The hearing of the brotherhood from Manendez can move forward despite the opposition of the provincial lawyer, and the Los Angeles Court has ruled.

Brotherhood lawyers are trying to resent from a lesser period, which may make them eligible for freedom.

Erik and Lille were convicted of killing their parents at the Beverly Hills Palace in 1989, a notorious case that still divides the Americans. They are currently serving a life imprisonment without the possibility of conditional release in California.

Friday’s ruling means a pair of prominent hearings next week to decide whether the convicted killers will enjoy them.

Nathan Hashman, Los Angeles County’s lawyer, expressed his fierce opposition to the husband, after his predecessor put the operation in a movement before the November elections.

The brothers’ efforts are based on California law that allows some prisoners between the ages of 26 years at the time of their crimes to seize the eligibility of potential conditional release – with the realization that brain development continues in the mid -twenties.

If the brothers are resenting 50 years as they were requested, this will make them immediately qualified for the conditional release.

Lael and Eric Mendez appeared to hear a distance via a video stream from San Diego prison. Both were wearing blue prison clothes and sometimes tense – looking down, vibrating chairs and taking deep breaths – as prosecutors listed graphic details of the killings.

The prosecutor’s office in the region argued that although the prosecutors can identify the prisoners who were rehabilitated during the bars, the act of discontent with someone should be used carefully.

Provincial lawyer, Habib Balian da George Jaskoun, former, criticized his support for resentment to move forward.

He said that GASCón’s decision to announce his support for the brothers resented it directly before the November elections, which Gascón lost to Hochman with a wide margin, was a political drive.

DA office argued that the brothers did not take responsibility completely and continued to understand the alleged lies in the case to blame.

Mark Giragos, the Mindez Brotherhood’s lawyer, argued that the provincial prosecutor’s office was more interested in re -identifying the previous trial and did not study what the spouses had been doing in the past 35 years in prison.

He said that the spouses have completed education while succeeding bars and worked to start rehabilitation programs for disabled and elderly prisoners, along with the traumatic imprisoned individuals.

The judge ruled that the prosecutors failed to show the reason for the lack of resentment efforts and stressed the importance of maintaining consistency even with the shifts in leadership.

“There is no new information,” the judge said. “Nothing of this is really new. They stuck to their story. He goes to whether it has been rehabilitated.”

The situation was Pay again to the audience’s eye Last year, with new evidence and the release of a New Netflix Drama, Monsters: Lyle and Erik Manendez story.

The series presented the case to a new generation and received the interest of celebrities – including Kim Kardashian and Rosie Odonel – who called for the release of the brotherhood.

Legal experts say that the result of the Manendez Brothers, which it accommodates, may take several forms, depending on how the judge ruled.

The most obvious path will be the complete denial of resentment, leaving his current punishment – life without the possibility of conditional release – well. This is the result that Los Angeles County lawyer Nathan Hoachman pays, saying that the brothers did not completely accept their crimes, and therefore they do not qualify for a reduced penalty.

Instead, the court, along with the previous recommendation of Da George Jaskoun, and resentment of brotherhood to 50 years. This would make them immediately qualified for conditional release, because they have already served more than 30 years. But eligibility does not guarantee the release; They still need to persuade the conditional release council that they are no longer dangerous to society.

Another possibility is that the judge chooses a modified sentence that reduces their punishment, but it does not open the door immediately to the conditional release. In this case, the brothers may face several years behind bars before they are eligible.

One of the three methods that the brothers chases in recent months is the three ways that the brothers chase in recent months in the hope of their release.

California Governor Gavin still weighs another option: granting the compassion.

New Love said that the brothers were scheduled to appear in front of the condition of the state’s conditional release on June 13 to discuss the results of the risk assessment he requested, and to study whether Eric and Lille posed a threat to society.

Depending on the results, the ruler can grant compassion, or transfer their penalties to make them eligible for a conditional release or even launch directly.

The third track that the brothers aspired – are asking a new trial – a barrier when the Hochman office announced that they are opposing the request.