‘Lunature’: Trump’s long history of abuse of judges who oppose him Donald Trump News

US President Donald Trump has multiplied his criticism of a federal judge, describing him as a “radical left” to ban The deportation of Venezuelan immigrantsAnd while his administration intensifies the speech against the courts.

On Tuesday, Trump called for isolating Judge James Boasberg, accusing him of developing the United States. “We do not want evil, violent and different criminals, many of whom are distorted killers, in our country,” Trump was actually published on social on Tuesday.

Boasberg, who works at the Federal Provincial Court in Washington, has been attacked since he issued an order to ban deposits on Saturday.

The Trump administration was accused of ignoring the orders of Pasperg by sending many aircraft carrying Venezuelan immigrants to the notorious Salvador prisons due to violations of rights. Trump summoned the law of foreign enemies for 1798, a mysterious law aimed at targeting citizens from the enemy state during the war period.

The courts prevented many Trump’s executive orders amid a few resistance from Republican -controlled Congress, and attracted the anger of officials.

Public Prosecutor Bam Bondi accused the judge of “interfering with our government” while the White House press secretary Caroline Levit believed that judges are acting as judicial activists.

For his part, the American president described Bouasberg as the “left radical left” appointed by (former president) Barack Hussein Obama. “

Supreme Court President John Roberts has criticize Calls for the dismissal of the judge Pasperg, but that did not prevent Trump from attacking the judge. The US President in Roberts also criticized, indicating that the Supreme Court itself was at risk due to political bias.

The latest speech is only one of a series of attacks by Trump against the judges and courts that challenge his policies or tolerate the cases that were presented against him.

Why did Trump clashed and officials from his administration with the judiciary? There is a disturbing pattern from Trump attacking judges and courts in the past. Let’s take a look.

A pattern of attacks?

Trump’s contempt for the courts precedes his presidency, but he reached new levels during his time in office. Usually, if the ruling went against him, the judge considered him Trump biased, incompetent or part of a left -wing plot.

One of the first examples came in 2016 when Trump, a presidential candidate, attacked the provincial judge, Gonzalo Korele, who was overseeing fraud lawsuits against Trump University, which has now ended. Trump suggested that Curiel was not fit for the presidency because of his Mexican heritage, describing him as “hate” and indicating that he could not be fair because of Trump’s strict position on immigration. The attack sparked widespread condemnation.

Once in the White House, Trump continued to fight the judiciary. In 2017, when Judge James Robert issued a temporary bloc over his travel ban, which targets the Islamic majority countries, Trump described him as “the so -called judge” and accused him of threatening national security.

In 2018, Trump called the American Court of Appeal Judge John Tjar, “Obama Judge”, after he had stipulated that a migrant could demand asylum regardless of the place where the country entered.

In the same year, Trump attacked the judiciary after the California Court of Appeal prevented his administration from deporting young immigrants who protect under a program during the Obama era.

Trump also did not hesitate to target the Supreme Court when he ruled against him.

He was angry when the court rejected his attempts to cancel the election results for the year 2020. Trump still believed his presidential elections in 2020 were stolen. In particular, he turned against the chief judge Roberts, describing him as “disgraceful” and “disappointment.”

Did his attacks be against the judiciary after the end of his first term?

With Trump’s legal problems after the end of his presidency in 2020, his attacks on judges became more personal. In the face of many indictment regulations ranging from election intervention to fraud, Trump has often moved to social media to condemn the judges who supervise his issues.

In the case of civil fraud in New York, where he was found responsible for strengthening his clear wealth, Trump called Judge Arthur Engonon “unjust” and “Trump hates, and the democratic operative”. He mocked the law clerk on social media, saying that he was “political and corrupt”, which led to a gag.

Despite the restrictions, Trump has not retreated.

In the case of interference in the federal elections, headed by Judge Tania Chutcan, Trump described it as a “high party”, “very biased and unfair”, and suggested outside it. His verbal pronouncing assaults led to the saying that his speech was at risk of judicial process and may incite threats against judges and court staff.

Chutccan Trump has warned against giving any “inflammatory data” before the first session.

“The defense of your customer is supposed to occur in this courtroom, not on the Internet,” Trump’s lawyer, Cotccan, told Trump’s lawyer, adding that the more anyone made the “inflammatory” statements on the case, the more urgency in moving the case quickly to the trial.

Trump also attacked the liberal Supreme Court judges, especially Sonia Sotomoor and Ruth Badr Ginsburg.

In 2020, Trump asked the “judges” to “appeal” themselves from the cases involved, accusing them of bias, especially after Sotomior criticized the Trump administration’s repeated appeal to the Supreme Court to intervene in low decisions in the court.

Trump moved to Twitter, who later became x, and called notes by Sotomayor “very inappropriate”.

His hostility to Jennsberg justice was more clear. Before her death in 2020, Gensburg publicly criticized Trump during his 2016 campaign, describing him as “Faker” and expressing his concern about his presidency.

Trump again fired, describing it as a “shame” of the court and demanded that she had resigned. After her death, he faced a violent reaction to nominate a conservative alternative, Amy Kony Barrett.

In 2020, Trump attacked Judge Amy Berman Jackson for being convicted of his long -term assistant Roger Stone in the case of calming witnesses. He said that the jury in Stone was “contaminated” as Trump’s fight is biased. The issue symbolizes political intervention in high -level cases, as Trump used social media to question the integrity of the judiciary. Stone was amnesty in December 2020 at the end of Trump’s first state.

Trump’s speech not only deepened the judiciary between his supporters, but also encouraged some to harass the judges and their families. For example, Judge Juan Mirchhan, who heads the Trump criminal case in New York, received death threats, and his trial was overwhelmed by hostilities after Trump’s public criticism.

Last year, former Federal Judge J. Michael Lotug launched Trump’s “evil” and “existential threat to the rule of law”, warning that undermining judicial independence could have long -term consequences for American democracy.

“His goal was to remove legitimacy from those courts,” said Lutog about Trump’s repeated verbal attacks.

Trump administration battle against the judiciary

Trump, however, looks unanswered. With his second term in full swing, experts say the rhetoric of Port by Trump and his officials, including his close billionaire Elon Musk, may raise a constitutional crisis.

Vice President JD Vance was accused of attacking judges who prevented some Trump’s executive orders. “Judges are not allowed to control the legitimate authority of the executive authority,” he wrote.

In agreement with Vans, Parliament Speaker Mike Johnson said: “The courts should back down and allow these operations to play.”

Days later, White House press secretary Levit said that some Trump’s agenda banned illegal.

Musk, Trump’s powerful advisor, has canceled the judges in more than 30 jobs on social media since January. Last week, he called for the judge to be expelled after he ordered the judge to restore web pages and health -related data groups from government websites.

Musk (DOGE) Ministry of Government Employee (DOGE) has launched thousands of federal government employees and closed federal agencies, including the United States Agency for International Development (USA International Development Agency), as part of efforts to reduce costs. On Wednesday, a judge said that Musk and Doge “may violate” the constitution in the closure of the United States Agency for International Development.

The unprecedented speech raised legal experts.

“Under our system, so far, it is always understood that the courts are the ones that decide whether the executive authority is legitimate or not,” Jeremy Paul, a law professor at the University of North Eston, told Associated Press.

The US president said he would not challenge the court. “I follow the courts. I must follow the law,” said on Wednesday at the Oval Office. But the previous day he complained that the judges were preventing his administration from stopping governmental government spending.

He said: “We want to get rid of corruption, and it seems that it is difficult to believe that the judge can say that we do not want you to do so.” “Therefore, we may have to look at the judges because I think it is a very dangerous violation.”

The new administration’s speech comes as at least 60 lawsuits have been filed for Trump’s actions since he took office in January, which led to a slowdown in his aggressive agenda, including the release of thousands of federal employees to reduce spending.

“There was a concerted effort to try to throw judges as an enemy,” said Claire Venkelstein, a professor of law at the University of Pennsylvania.

“The idea that he can start removing judges is fictional, but it can make their lives very difficult they may start to resign. I think this is part of trying here.”

What is the process of isolating judges for us?

Amid a choir to dismiss the judges, legal experts say it is not an easy process. Members of the House of Representatives can submit articles of dismissal against the judge.

Congress can isolate the judge if the House of Representatives tops a simple majority. After wiping the article, he goes to the Senate for trial. The majority of two -thirds are required to condemn a judge in the upper room of Congress.

Republican representative of the House of Representatives, Elie Crin, presented articles from the judge against the American provincial judge, Paul Engelyer, who prevented Dog’s arrival in the treasury department.

At least 15 judges have been isolated in the history of the United States.