Kevin Smith was writing doctrine 2, but there will be two major changes in sequel

For longer time, a word about what might happen with 1999 Kevin Smith Obus “doctrine” Nothing was. Beatogenic in the clutches of the Winstein brothers, the original movie seemed to be It is likely that it will not be re -released in theaters, on physical media or flowDo not care about the continuation that has been going on for a long time. Fortunately, Thanks to the efforts of the iconic events and othersSmith regained control of the film, as such, began a huge multi -city tour, which shows a new restoration of the film and also appears in the high -screen questions and answers. Both this writer and /Ethan Underon’s movie were lucky to attend some of these shows (in Los Angeles and Chicago, respectively), and got heard some wonderful stories about making “belief” and their resurrection.

advertisement

Although Smith mentioned in both presentations that he is currently working on a suitable “doctrine” supplement, he had questions and answers in Chicago as he fill out some of the details specified about the shape of this film and who will participate. To be clear, no text or cure for the film has been written yet; Smith was keen to explain his writing process, which only involves a small amount of actual writing. As he said in Chicago questions and answers:

“Writing is like, sitting in your car, dismantling traffic, like,” What will Jay and Celint Bob do? And he led in an accident … all this, and then, by the time when you reach this (simulating writing), this is just a kind of muscle memory.

advertisement

As it turned out, “The Narration” so far includes two main changes: a new leading figure, along with the shocking revelation about the fate of Jay & Silent Bob.

During a question and answer in Chicago on April 26, Smith described the various reflections he had until now regarding what might happen in “Dogma 2.” The first major change (again, based on what is in Smith’s head at the moment) is that the film will not follow the last descendant, also known as Bethany Sloane (played in the first movie written by Linda Fioreno), but her adult daughter, a woman called Rovos. This name, of course, will serve as a bonus of a gag from the first movie, where the thirteenth Chris Rock Messenger, Rovos, was asking whether a Bethani child could be named after him.

advertisement

According to Samith, the film would pace the basic structure of the first “doctrine”, where Rovos will be sent on a mission “and he will have” re -gathering the team “. “He returned a day, when I was a child.”

“When I went in search of Jay and Celint Bob, I always thought she would find Jay alone. Jay explains that he and Samil Bob have separated. She is,” Well, where is he? “Then, we cut a field in dust, and there is a giant tent in a field, and a group of cars intervened, and the music of the members, which is an old baptists’ revival, is similar to that,” I am here. “

advertisement

It is clear that this idea related to the division of Jay & Silent Bob will be a little bomb for long -term characters, especially given the place that ended after “Jay & Silent Bob Root” and “Clerks III”. Does this mean that “Dogma 2” may happen before these films, or elsewhere in the ASKWNIVERSE schedule? Or maybe Silent Bob took Dante’s sudden disappearance in “Clerks III” As a sign should find religion? Whatever it is, Smith only mentioned that he may still include this plot point, saying that he guessed, “It is still possible to work.”

Again, it confirms how this is everything just reflections of what “Dogma 2” might be, and Smith went on to say that this period of initial brainstorming of my work is “the best time”, and that the final movie (if it might be) “could be anything.” Although he refused to say whether these changes would appear unambiguously in “Dogma 2”, one of the aspects in which he seemed to be steadfast on the approach that will be played towards religion, which is significantly different from the first movie. Apparently, Kevin Smith, who made a “doctrine” in 1999, was a religious believer, while Kevin Smith in 2025 was a different person. The director also explained:

advertisement

“I know it will look different, because this (the movie) here, oh, this was made by a child who believed at that time. He believed in all these things. It was not a paradox. This was his fate. So, if I was doing a complement“ doctrine, ”I can’t do this. I no longer feel these feelings.

If these comments give one pause about Smith close to the “doctrine” complement at all, there is no need to worry; Smith himself realizes this repulsion and hopes to make his new beliefs help, not an obstacle. As he explained:

“But what I lack it in believing in” doctrine 2 “, I think I will compensate for extreme intelligence. I have to do so. There is no choice, right? Otherwise, so that you do not approach it. But I found a way in where I was,” Oh, this is wonderful “, and I was happy.”

advertisement

This “Road in” Smith refers to something that he talked about in both Los Angeles and Chicago’s offers, and whatever the story element this is the completion of his completion, he has not yet told him. However, it appears that he brought it, to the point that his claim that “Doctrine 2” can shoot early next year may already come. After all, as it proves the release of “doctrine”, miracles can occur. Therefore, we hope that we can testify to “doctrine 2” at some point in the near future.