Justin Balany’s lawyer Blake Blake Blake Blivik Bayes is in the midst of a legal war

Justin Balounilawyer , Brian FremaN, criticize Blake Blake After she applied to dismiss the representative’s defamation suit of $ 400 million.

Friedman claims that the actress is trying to manipulate the legal system as a “distinguished elite”, but she pledged to continue her accountability for “her actions from pure malice.”

Judge Luis Lieman has already placed a perpetuated matter on Blake Livly and her husband Ryan Reynolds“Distinguished” conversations “prominent individuals” after they requested this, expressing fears that Justin Baldouni could leak them to the press.

She recently criticized a budget lawyer after she requested that she get a $ 400 million settlement against her, her husband Reynolds, and her propaganda Leslie Sloan, who was informed of the court.

Friedman said in a joint statement with Daily Mail. “Strict rules are placed in their place to protect innocent people and allow individuals to truly defend themselves.”

He went further than that, noting that “the laws are not intended to be twisted and sponsored by the distinguished elites to suit her personal agenda”, where he pledged to “continue to hold Mrs. Levli accounting for her behavior from pure pure, which includes accusing the corners of my client of harassment and revenge.”

Friedman added that the “Gossip Girl” claims will explode quickly as Discovery moves forward, and easily retreated with actual evidence, proof. “

According to the news outlet, Livley’s lawyers submitted a request to all cases against the actress to drop it, and a mark of the 400 million dollar lawsuit from the blogger as “retaliatory and longing” with the claim that “the matter that ends with” the director’s proposal “is” a deep abuse of the legal process that has no place in the Federal Court. “

The court documents also showed that its ongoing legal procedures against vitality may end the debt team cost 100 million dollars due to a legal ruling in Article 47.1 of the California Law, which provides protection for individuals who talked about sexual harassment or raised legal claims.

The documents said: “The law prohibits lawsuits for defamation in weapons, such as this law, for revenge against individuals who have submitted legal claims or publicly spoke about sexual harassment and revenge.”

“The right to search for legal compensation and the right of the press to report it is sacred principles protected through multiple privileges, including litigation and fair reports privileges, which are divorced,” continued.

“Moreover, by choosing to submit their claims under the California Law, Wayfarer parties voluntarily offered a full lawsuit for the privilege of sexual harassment in the civil section of California, which was recently yearned (Section 47.1), which prevents recently enact reign against sexual disclosure of sexual harassment and relevant solutions, including cases related to chewing.

Livley’s lawyer, led by Mike Gottlieb and Asra Hudson, gave reasons behind her request to reject a defaming case.

After claiming that the lawsuit is “a deep abuse of the legal process that has no place in the Federal Court,” they went further to note that California laws “explicitly prohibit the prosecution of victims” who spoke against sexual harassment or revenge.

They said: “This lawsuit, which is indisputable and vengeful, is managed first to three legal obstacles, including litigation, fair report, sexual harassment privileges, which the latter contain a mandatory ruling in changing the fees that will require the likes of billionaire Saritz, Wayfarer Studios, and other definition prosecutors against MS.

The lawyers added, “In other words, in an epic self -ownership, the Wayfareer ‘parties’ attempt to sue Lively’ in forgetfulness” only created more responsibility for them, and deserved it, given what they did. “

Levli’s proposal to dismiss after her husband, Ryan Reynolds, was rejected to reject a blame case against him, claiming that the actor could not sue him about “painful feelings.”

She accused a lawsuit with Renolds of ridicule and bullying using the “Nicepool” character in “Deadpool & Wolverine” to amplify the “feminism” image in Baldoni.

Reynolds also accused him of describing him as a “sexual predator” while he also claims to drain him from allegedly “reduced fat.”

In a proposal to dismiss the claims, Reynold’s lawyer did not contest that the Nicepool character relies on the inferiority, but he said that he showed “fine anger” through the complaint, for all of that, for all. diverse.

Reynolds’ lawyers indicated in their file that putting signs on the actor for Baldoni as a “sexual predator” is protected under the constitution.

The allegations indicate that Mr. Reynolds sincerely, perhaps enthusiastically, believes that Mr. Baldouni’s behavior reflects the “predator”, “the movement mentioned. (R) The law proves that the description of a person as a “predator” is constitutionally protected … while the master of the one “may not be called” the predator “, these painful feelings do not lead to legal claims.”

The court document came: “Mr. Reynolds has the right to amend the first amendment to maintaining Mr. Balouni – or any man who believes Mr. Reynolds sexual harassment of his wife – in” deep contempt. “