Judges prevent Trump’s financing discounts

On Thursday (April 24), the judges prevented the Trump administration threats to reduce federal financing of public schools, For every Associated Press agency. President Donald Trump has sought to reduce school funds with diversity, fairness and inclusion programs. However, the judges ruled in favor of a lawsuit from the National Society for Education and the Union of American Civil Liberties. The lawsuit accused the republican administration of giving “mysterious, unconstitutional” directives and violating the rights of the first amendment to teachers.

Related to: What next? President Trump speaks student loans after signing the executive order to end the Ministry of Education

What do you know about Trump’s directives?

Earlier this month, countries ordered the collection of signatures from local school systems that are witnessing compliance with civil rights laws. This includes rejecting the “illegal DEI practices”.

At the same time, the directives do not have the power of the law behind them. However, they threaten the use of civil rights to rid schools of Dei. The administration has warned schools that continuing such practices “violating federal law” could lead to the US Department of Justice and end grants and federal contracts.

In February, the administration issued a memorandum for schools and colleges that urge them to end the practice of distinguishing between people on the basis of race. The states were granted until the end of Thursday (April 24) to submit a certificate of compliance with their schools. However, some have indicated that they will not obey the matter.

Also, the department’s memo said in February that schools promoted Dei’s efforts while throwing white American and Asian students under the bus. It depends on a dramatic interpretation of the Supreme Court Resolution 2023. This decision prohibits the use of race for admission to the college in all aspects of education. These aspects include employment, promotion, scholarships, housing, graduation parties, and campus life.

Meanwhile, a letter in April from the states was requested to collect a certificate form from local educational areas as well as signing it on behalf of the state. Messages aim to ensure that schools follow the guidelines of the sixth title of the Civil Rights Law of 1964. Schools and countries are already required to provide assurances of this meaning in separate papers. But the new model adds a language to Dei. The language warns that the use of diversity programs for discrimination can lead to financing discounts, fines and other penalties. The model threatens the access of schools to the first address, and the largest source of federal revenue for education K-12 and the artery of life for schools in low-income areas.

Details about judges’ orders about diversity programs

On Thursday, another judge in Maryland has postponed the date of the validity of some directives to combat the Ministry of Education in the United States. A third judge in Washington, DC, prevented another verdict.

American boycott court Judge Landia Macavirti In New Hampshire said that April speech does not show what the administration believes that the DEI program requires it or when it is believed that such programs violate the Civil Rights Law. “Do not even specify the” Dei “program,” Mcaviri books. The judge also said that there is a reason for the belief that the actions of the administration violate the rights of freedom of expression for teachers.

“A professor contradicts the speech in 2025 if she expresses her view of her teaching that structural racism is present in America, but she does not do so if she refuses to exist of structural racism. This is to distinguish the point of view of textbooks,” Mcaviri wrote.

In the rule in Maryland, the American region Judge Stephanie Gallaghar Postpone this memo. She said that the memo was not issued correctly. For every judge, teachers also force the choice between “An injury by suppressing their discourse or by facing implementation to exercise their constitutional rights.” The American Federation of Teachers, one of the largest teachers ’unions in the country, filed the lawsuit.

“The court agreed that this mysterious and unconstitutional condition is clearly a dangerous attack on students, our profession, our sincere history and the same knowledge,” Randy Winjern, Aft president, said in a statement.

Also, a judge in Washington was granted a preliminary judicial order against the ratification speech. NAACP has failed to define specific DEI practices that would violate the law. All three lawsuits argue that guidance limits academic freedom. They also claim that the message is mysterious and leaves schools and teachers to forget about what they might do. For example, it does not explain that it is still allowed to voluntary students’ groups for minority students.

What does the Minister of Education say?

Nevertheless, President Donald Trump, Linda McMahon, is standing alongside Trump’s directives. She previously warned of possible financing discounts if the countries did not return the model by Friday. In an interview on Tuesday on Fox Business Network “The risk of some goal in their areas.” The purpose of the model is “To ensure that there is no discrimination in any of the schools,” She said.

Related to: You got student loans in the default? The Ministry of Education is coming to collect its currencies!

---

The Associated Press Holly Ramer and Collin Pinkley contributed to this report.