Open the newsletter to watch the White House for free
Your guide to what the American elections mean 2024 for Washington and the world
Jenner & Block filed a lawsuit against the United States government on Donald Trump’s executive order that targeted the law office for his relations with the public prosecutor who has achieved in the alleged collusion of the president with Russia during his 2016 successful presidential campaign.
The company said in a statement on Friday that the lawsuit seeks to “stop an unconstitutional executive order that has already been declared illegal by a federal court.” Jenner & Block also asked the court temporarily to prevent guidance.
The executive order that Reverse other modern directives Supporting large law firms, he asked federal agencies to suspend security permits and review or terminate government contracts with companies or entities that deal with Jenner & Block.
Jenner & Block said that not fighting the guidance “means giving up our ability to call enthusiastically to all our customers and surrendering to coercion of the unconstitutional government, which is simply not in our DNA.”
“The Trump administration is efficiently eliminating waste, fraud and ill -treatment in the federal government. It is tampering with the millions of dollars in law firm to maintain its access to government privileges and women.”
The lawsuit comes at a time when Trump took the goal of opponents imagined in the major law, as it targeted companies with historical affiliations of the Democratic Party or former prosecutors who looked for the president. Similar orders have taken the goal of Perkins Koyand Welter Paul Weiss. Another matter was directed at Covington & Burling narrower in the range.
Perkins Coie also filed a lawsuit against the matter against him from speeding up and won a restriction from a federal judge. Through Jenner’s lawsuit, the clear division began to appear in the community of senior American law firms – those that chose to fight, in exchange for those who chose to surrender to Trump’s demands.
Paul WeissAnd a largest company, which concluded a direct deal with the president to cancel an order he said would have hindered its work, and Skadden Arps is said to be in talks to calm a similar order against it. Paul Weiss pledged to measures, including $ 40 million of excellent legal services for reasons that support the administration, such as combating anti -Semitism and supporting old warriors.
The executive orders, as well as the Paul Weiss deal, have sent shock waves across the legal industry, as law firms are racing to photograph emergency plans if they are targeted by the White House, while existential dilemmas weigh about how to respond to these ranges.
the to request “The party claim as part of the unjustified investigation of Robert Muller,” said Andrew Weissman, a former partner in the company that worked to achieve Russian collusion. The specialized lawyer did not find any evidence of collusion. Weissmann, a professor at New York University’s Law Faculty, has not responded to a request to comment on the request. Trump’s order was martyred against Wilterluel with the company’s relationship with the company, from which he retired in 2021.
The guidance against Jenner & Block also said that it “misunderstood her free practicing to participate in activities to undermine justice and the interests of the United States,” noting what appears to be challenging the administration’s positions on immigration issues and transgender people.
https://www.ft.com/__origami/service/image/v2/images/raw/https%3A%2F%2Fd1e00ek4ebabms.cloudfront.net%2Fproduction%2Fd3272c25-702f-4003-9766-087437f67cf9.jpg?source=next-article&fit=scale-down&quality=highest&width=700&dpr=1
Source link