Jay Z’s alleged son extends a helping hand to the rapper accused of rape

Jay ZThe alleged son Reimer Satterthwaitepublicly expressed his support for the rapper’s rape accuser as legal proceedings against the music mogul continue.

In a statement, the 31-year-old extended what he called a “helping hand” to Jane Doe, who accused his alleged father and Sean “Diddy” Combs He raped her at a party when she was 13 years old.

Raymer Satterthwaite previously claimed that his family faced years of intimidation and pressure stemming from the paternity case against Jay-Z.

Talk to American Sun, Satterthwaite once again commented on Jay Z’s rape case, this time offering support to the accuser while accusing the rapper of bullying.

“As you know, we stand behind anyone who is being bullied,” Satterthwaite told the outlet. “You know, we’re always helping her, we’ll help her with anything she needs from us or our team, and we’re there for her.”

The 31-year-old told Jane Doe to stay strong in her legal battle against Jay-Z, just like he did, even if she faces setbacks.

“We’ve battled these lawyers and these judges and big celebrity cases and things like that for years, so I can tell you it’s been a battle, but don’t give up,” Satterthwaite continued.

“You don’t always win the fight, but you always get up and try again, and you know it’s not the end of the world.”

Satterthwaite, along with his godmother Dr Lily Colley, had previously spoken out about an alleged plot to pressure him to drop the case, including incidents of intimidation and the fact that he was never put to trial over his claims.

Regarding the alleged intimidation incidents, Satterthwaite claimed he was followed, had his car shot at, and had people drive into his garden at 4 a.m., as previously stated in the recent lawsuit against the rapper.

While he did not directly blame Jay-Z or his team for these incidents, he did state that the “pop-ups” at his house and “random shootings” did not begin until after his case with the rapper began.

The 31-year-old’s godmother then highlighted their claims that Jay-Z conspired with the court system to deprive them of their “constitutional rights” and prevent them from bringing their case to court.

“We’ve never had a trial, we’ve never had a hearing, we’ve never had a day in court. Everything has been taken away and dismissed and silenced,” Cooley said. “And that’s why we fight because it’s more about constitutional rights.

In a previous interview, Cooley discussed how Jay-Z’s ongoing rape lawsuit could represent a “day of reckoning” for the rapper’s career and the music industry as a whole.

“That’s why you have to be careful in how you deal with people and what you do because I believe you will reap what you sow,” Cooley said. American Sun.

Cooley also believes the latest accusations could “spill over” to their case because they “show the broader narrative and broader scope of what’s going on and that this is deep and wide-ranging.”

However, she did not provide any further clarification on how she thought this would happen or whether the rape accuser’s legal team had contacted her.

In the same interview, Satterthwaite said he was not motivated by fame or money to pursue paternity claims against Jay-Z.

“I’m really not trying to stalk you, so I don’t get fame or money from you. I don’t want anything from you. I’ve always said that,” the alleged son told the outlet.

Satterthwaite went on to express his anger about the case continuing all these years.

“You guys went and dragged their feet on this. For years and years, you didn’t give us due process,” he said.

He also pointed out that the case caused him and his family “harm” and “pressure,” stressing that they are only looking for “the truth” and are not trying to harm anyone.

In a file he obtained Fox News DigitalJay-Z’s lawyer, Alex Spiro, has expressed concerns that the rapper’s accuser will destroy evidence in their case after the alleged victim admitted making mistakes in her claims.

As part of the documents, the attorney urged the court to compel the unidentified accuser and her attorney, Tony Buzbee, to “preserve all evidence relevant to this case.”

Jay-Z’s lawyer also poked holes in the alleged victim’s case, pointing out mistakes she made in her claims during the interview.

This includes Jane Doe’s claim that the assault occurred at a private residence, which according to Jay Z’s lawyer does not exist.

“The timeline, location, and occurrence of the events alleged in Plaintiff’s complaint are made impossible by these admissions,” Jay-Z’s attorney also wrote in the documents. “The factual inconsistencies, the impossibility of the timeline, and the lack of supporting evidence make Plaintiff’s claims… completely unreliable.”