James Cameron changes the opinion of artificial intelligence, wants to see that he is used to “reduce the cost to half”

James Cameron’s position on artificial intelligence It has evolved over the past few years, and feels that Hollywood needs to embrace it in several different ways.

Cameron joined the board of stability last year, explaining his decision on the Podcast “Bose to the Future” last week.

“The goal was to understand the space, and to understand what the developers’ minds,” he said. “What are they targeting? What is their development cycle?

He added that the transition to artificial intelligence is necessary.

What is artificial intelligence (AI)?

“It is not only hypothetical. We have to want to continue to see the types of films that I have always loved and I love to do them and I will see-“ sand dunes ”: the second part” or one of my films or the effects of great effects, so well-we should learn how to cut the cost of that.

“Now it is not a matter of demobilization of half of the VFX employees. It is related to double their speed until a certain snapshot is finished, so your rhythm is faster and the productivity cycle is faster, and artists can move forward and do other wonderful things, then other wonderful things, right? This is a kind of vision of that.”

Cameron eventually does not believe that movies are “a big goal” for companies like Openai.

He laughed, saying: “Their goal is not to make Genai movies. We are a little wart on their ass.”

“Films are just a small application, the state of small use, which is very small at the present time. This is the problem. Genai developer will be smaller boutique, or this is called, or this answers are called, or the so -called CG.

Arnold Schwarznegger claims the future from the concession “Terminator” is “here today”

Rotoscoping is a task that includes drawing or tracking the framework of direct workshops by frame.

Cameron said that people do not enter into filmmaking and VFX to do it “the underwater needle point from Roto (scope). There is a lot of such tasks,” such as changing the frame from the frame to capture the movement that feels it can make Amnesty International more expensive. “

He said: “All this is the common sense, right? All you have to do is what is like feeding a few millions of pictures of the real world and have a stupid algorithm.” He discovered it.

Cameron previously condemned the use of artificial intelligence in 2023, citing it 1984 The movie “The Terminator” As a warning.

Click here to register in the entertainment newsletter

“I think the artificial intelligence weapon is the greatest danger,” Canadian CTV told CTV at the time.

“I think we will enter the equivalent of the nuclear arms race with artificial intelligence, and if we do not build it, the other players will definitely build it, and then it will rise,” Cameron said.

He continued, “You can imagine Amnesty International in a combat theater. The whole thing is just that it is to go into computers at speed. Humans can no longer be able to mediate, and you do not have the ability to get rid of broadcasting.”

“I warned you, comrades in 1984, and you did not listen,” Cameron said. Amnesty International destroy humanity.

The coordinator of the Arnold Schwarzneygger wants a “fair contract” where artificial intelligence continues on the horizon on Hollywood Strick.

At that time, Cameron said he was not concerned about replacing creators from artificial intelligence, saying: “It is not the issue of who wrote it, it is a question that it is a good story?”

“I only do not personally think that the non -embodied mind that is renewed only what the other embodied minds said – about the life they had, about love, about lying, from fear, from deaths – and everything gathered in the authority of a word and then repeat it … I do not think I have something that will move the audience.”

On the “Bose to the Future”, Cameron reduced the negative emotions a lot of Entertainment industry She participated about the Impact Intelligence.

He said, “A lot of hesitation in Hollywood and entertainment in general are issues of materials for training data and who deserves what and protects copyright and all this kind of things, and I think people look at everything wrong, personally,” he said.

Like what you read? Click here for more entertainment news

He explained that the brains of everyone are already working mainly like artificial intelligence: “You are creating a model and you are going through life for treatment quickly through this model every new situation is running. You do not say,” Wait again, I will return. “… Do not work this way.”

“My points are, as a screenwriter, as a film director, if you copy exactly “Star Wars”, “ I will sue. In fact, I will not go to this extent. Everyone will say that it is very similar to the “Star Wars”, we will file a lawsuit. I will not even get money. As a script writer, you have a kind of integrated moral candidate who says, “I know my source, I know what I like. I know what I mimic. I also know that I must move it away enough to my independent cell.”

Cameron agreed that there should be a “legal perspective”, but it is believed that the focus should be on the essence of the output and whether it is liquidated for the inputs.

“You cannot control my inputs. You cannot tell me what to be seen and what to see and where I go. My input is all that I chose to be and anything that has accumulated throughout my life. My outputs must be judged if it is very close or suicide bomber,” admitting that people think about “the possibility of liquefaction of libraries and all this kind of things.”

“The Brutalist” is the Oscar -winning film for artificial intelligence after controversy

Some companies already allow Artificial intelligence companies Access to their back catalog.

Lionsgate, studio behind movies such as “The Hunger Games” and “Twilight”, participated with AI Research Company last September to “create and train a new AI model, dedicated to the Lionsgate portfolio of film and television content,” according to the content of films and television, “according to what I mentioned. A statement from the company at that time.

Cameron admitted that he does not like someone’s idea that uses artificial intelligence to imitate him.

“I think we should inhibit the text router that says” James Cameron “or in the style of” Zac Snyder “or” in a style. “Create your own style.”

Trump urged Ben Steller, Paul McCartney and hundreds of stars to protect the rules of publishing rights. Amnesty International

The direction of generating images was launched in specific patterns on social media, creating a debate about copyright and originality.

Recently, people were regularly sharing the pictures created in the style of the Japanese animation company Studio GHibliAnd increased fueling of the discussion.

But Cameron did not see a problem.

“How is Studio Ghibli to harm from the art of fans?” Cameron asked the podcast, noting that the art of fans was “forever.”

“You cannot stop the art of fans, you do not want to stop the art of fans. It is an expression. They repeat something they responded to, as it makes them feel sharing in this universe. These things must be encouraged.”

Click here to get the Fox News app

However, the line was drawn in a financial gain.

“If someone goes out and tries to earn money in a way that hurts the GHibli studio and can be proven, I think this is where you should draw the line.”

He continued: “How is anything different from selling a shirt and on the shirt is the image of Luke Sky Walker? You can’t do it. Lukasters can do it. You can’t do it. This is piracy. It will not be closed. However, if you just want to wear one and express your Vandom for” stars wars “, you are not damaged.”