“It is not a priority anymore …”: After that of the collective workers are exposed to the crisis of the use of external sources in the United States, which raises the discussion

The American labor market is going through a calm, but it is dependent. With the increase in employment costs and the tightening of regulations, companies are increasingly marginalizing local employment in favor of cheaper and external alternatives. This transformation, which is once limited to peripheral functions, is now deeper in the basic processes, which caused anxiety among American workers. The Reddit Raw account on the demobilization of workers in a major engineering company has struck a nerve via the Internet, as it gave a realistic overview of what a lot of fear fears is the future of white collar work in America.

With the highlight of the wider direction, the user wrote, “The American market is no longer a priority for employment unless it includes very specialized roles.”

“I have recently succeeded,” they added, “I recently escaped the demobilization of workers in a large engineering company. In the last round, the majority of workers targeted employees in the United States and Western Europe, while the teams in Eastern Europe and India were not greatly affected.

According to the user, the company’s strategy is clear: giving priority to reducing costs for local workers. *”Most of the new talents will be recruited abroad due to the costs of cost. This shift is very frustrating. These companies seem to have become hollow copies of American companies, while the administration remains locally while honoring most of the operating roles.”

They felt frustrated and underestimated, they wondered about what might come after that: “What is the next? I alternative training abroad and leaving it in the next round because I do a lot? Does this remind us of what happened to the IT industry in the 1990s?”

The echo of the post widely, and the drawing of responses from others who face similar conditions. One of the users, “The last company I worked with (Fortune 200 Financial Services Company). They literally used it like 80-90 % of it, support the application, and development to India … within three years, we had to start returning the jobs, it was very bad.”

They also highlighted the hidden costs to use external sources: “You do not save money when your applications are broken/broken, when projects end up with cost excesses. Many of these Indian companies also urinate people on you constantly … which causes fixed problems and delay.”

Another commentator blamed the lack of organization in the United States. The user said: “Other countries have legal percentage rates from the workforce that must be in the country. It is not the case for the United States. Companies will use any excuse for layoffs … The reality is that profits will continue to rise and that employees will eat shit.”

Some compare the current wave with a boom to use external sources in the 1990s, indicating the main differences. “Amnesty International makes everyone better … a higher basic talent all over the world … the use of external sources is not as cheap as it was. But leaders continue to re -learn the same mistakes just to appease Wall Street.”

Others expressed concern about the external direction scale and direction: “I see more and more in all areas in all industries. Companies are just the use of external sources of India and the Philippines and employing 3-4 employees at the cost of one American employee.”

He confirmed a particularly blatant comment on the resentment building between the workers. “USC is now informed publicly by its Indian managers that all employment will be transferred to India. America has lost its war for independence and now the Indian colony has become officially,” I read The Post.