India, Pakistani tensions rise after a tourist attack: What we know so far – my country

India and Pakistan The visits that were canceled for their citizens were canceled for each other on Thursday, and Islamabad’s revenge after New Delhi suspended the Water -sharing Treaty, The Indus Treaty, between the two countries.

The reduction in diplomacy between the two countries comes after a Tourist attack In India, the officials blamed the Pakistani militants.

On Tuesday, the gunman of the fire in the Kashmir region, which was strongly disputed, killed 26 people, most of them tourists, making it the bloodiest attack on civilians in the area recently.

No group was officially responsible for the attack.

Repercussions

In response, India said it would play all visas issued to Pakistani citizens from Sunday and currently ordered the Pakistanis in the country to leave before.

It also announced that it was cutting the diplomatic staff, closing the useable land border crossing between India and Pakistan and suspending a water -sharing treaty.

In response to revenge, Pakistan closed the airspace of all the airlines owned by the Indians or that operate the Indians and suspended all trade with India, including to and from any third -party country.

On Wednesday, Indian Defense Minister Rajnath Singh pledged “not only to track those who committed the attack but also followed those who conspired to commit this evil act on our soil,” and hinted at the possibility of military strikes, according to the Associated Press.

The Pakistani National Security Committee condemned the “warring measures” of India. He said that although Pakistan has been committed to peace, it will never allow anyone to “overcome its sovereignty, security, dignity and inalienable rights.”

Government ministers have alluded to both sides that the conflict can escalate to military action. “Any kinetic step from India will see a kinetic response against.”

New Delhi describes all strictness in Kashmir as Pakistan -backed terrorism. Pakistan denies this, and many Muslim Kashmiris consider the militants part of the local freedom struggle.

During a speech on Thursday, the Prime Minister in India Narendra Modi promised to find those responsible for the attack.

“We will follow them to the ends of the earth,”

Why Kashmir matters

Kashmir, which is located in the far north of the Indian subcontinent, is currently divided between India and Pakistan, where each of them controls about half of the region with its entire claim. China also exercises specialization in East Kashmir.

The Himalayas region became a field for the firm competition in 1947 when both countries gained independence from British rule, leaving the Freedom of Kashmir in choosing the country to which it will join, if any.

At that time, its leader, Al -Maharaja in Kashmir, Harry Singh, wanted to remain independent, although he signed a temporary “suspended agreement” with Pakistan to maintain the current situation and support transportation and other services.

Shortly later, he chose to take military assistance from India when the invasion of the Pakistani rebels, which partially prompted the lack of a fever in decision -making, caused widespread disturbances.

Lord Louis Mongbatten, the former governor of India, entered, and suggested as a temporary peace measure to join Kashmir to India, followed by a vote to ratify his official status. Harry Singh signed the accession agreement shortly after, and handed over its foreign and defensive policies to India.

Going now

• Trump says 25 % of automatic definitions “can rise for Canada” at some point “

• Advanced polls destroy records. What are the days and provinces that have seen the largest number of votes?

The Indian forces began taking two -thirds of the region, as Pakistani forces exercise control of the remaining northern region.

Whether the Indian forces entered Kashmir before or after Harry Singh signed the agreement still in a conflict between India and Pakistan.

India argues that Harry Singh signed first, as it has legitimized the presence of their forces, but Pakistan argued that the Maharaja was not signed before the Indian forces entered Kashmir and that he went beyond the “stop” agreement with Pakistan.

None of the countries has deviated from its position for decades, although some Kashmiris compete for independence, a solution that Pakistan neither wants nor India to think about it.

It has fought many wars between Pakistan and India Ali Kashmir since 1947, including in 1947-1948, 1965, 1971 and 1999, according to National Geographic.

What is the endoswater Treaty?

Nuclear armed neighbors do not agree to use water from rivers flowing in the direction of the course of India to the Sind River basin in Pakistan.

The Endoswater Treaty, which is mediated by the World Bank and its signature by neighbors in September 1960, is divided into Indoz and its tributaries between the two countries and the participation of water -subject. India was awarded the use of water from three East rivers – Sutlig, Bez and Ravi – while Pakistan was granted most of the three western rivers – Endos, Jillum and Chainab.

There is no ruling in the treaty of any of the countries to suspend or end the agreement unilaterally, which contains clear conflict resolution systems.

Pakistan relies heavily on the water of this river system to meet its electrical and irrigation needs. Pakistan says that India is fairly transformed into the source of bars and dams, which is a charge denied by India.

Pakistan is concerned that India dams will cut off on the river, which nourishes 80 percent of irrigated agriculture.

India has accused Pakistan of withdrawing the complaints process, and says that building its photovoltaic projects in Keishnganga and Coight under the treaty. It has also sought to amend the agreement to circumvent such delays.

The comment on the agreement is not expected to have an immediate impact on the flow of water to Pakistan because India does not have enough storage capacity, but India’s move may bring uncertainty in the agricultural system in Pakistan.

Indian officials said that this comment means that India can stop sharing important information and data about the launch of water from bars/dams or in the floods, adding that New Delhi will not be obligated to launch the minimum water quantities during the lean season.

–

– With files from the Associated Press and Reuters