I use the history of my artificial intelligence to my psychologically. Is this good?

Stay in view of the free updates

Simply subscribe to artificial intelligence Myft Digest – it is delivered directly to your inbox.

Anyone has a swimming pool in the mysterious swimming pool that dates back online that it may sometimes be a dark place. Therefore, it is wise to do a spot of due care before they appear somewhere to meet a stranger from the Internet, which may or not to be tremors, a vampire of energy or actually a fictional character created by a former flame. I, unfortunately, I have personal experience from the three.

But the last date took this idea and really ran with it. Not only did Google come before our first confrontation, but he also asked Shatat A new “deep search” tool To, well, deep search for me, and reach a psychological profile. and From eight pages Psychological personality.

The machine said: “Kelly coincides with being an intellectual, independent, thinking and courageous curiosity in its convictions … which indicates a high degree of self -confidence and integrity.” “Its comic stories about her factors that betray her from the ego and the ability to laugh at herself … psychologically, one can describe Kelly as skeptical with conscience.”

Everything is nice enough. But I am not sure that he is completely captured by what I might feel and act in the context of dating. Does the device think that I have nothing more than the opinions that I have expressed publicly? No degree of uncertainty or doubt about its analysis appeared. Also, does it mean that most skeptics do not have a conscience? Psychologically, one can describe the device as an entity that faces an intellectual challenge with excessive self -confidence.

Initially, I was not really mindful that my history was surprised by chatting-I was a little surprised, but the fact that he told me about it, it made it somewhat light, and I thought it was likely to be probably and adventure. But then I started thinking about less delicious characters to do the same, and I started to feel more distress.

Is it moral use of obstetric artificial intelligence in this way? Just because the information is there, does this mean access to a processor of artificial, combined, seeded, classified from a fair game? I thought I would turn to another? – The device to answer.

“While using artificial intelligence to acquire visions around someone that may seem tempting, psychological stereotypes can be without its knowledge of invasive and unfair.” “People are complex, and artificial intelligence cannot replace real human interaction, observation and intuition.”

Finally, some self -awareness! It is not enough to prevent it from providing the “invasive and unfair” psychological file in the first place. The Gueini Ai model of Google was the most in its response. “Chatgpt should not be used for a person’s file without his explicit consent, as it can be a violation of privacy and perhaps harmful.”

However, when I asked Gemini a psychological profile, it was very good to be obligated. The result was slightly precious and largely creeping in the way I tried to conclude wider aspects of my personality. GIMII suggested that “my direct” “direct” confrontation “, and also that” the level of details and accuracy in my analysis “was a possible sign of” perfection “, which” may lead to a higher level of stress. ”

Gemini presented “evacuation of responsibility”, noting that this was a “file of speculation” and that “it was not intended to be a final psychological assessment.” But it is worrying that no questions are asked about whether the person I was looking for had gave their approval to be determined in this way, and I did not warn that what I was doing was invading or unfair.

The advice published by Open AI “is its approach to shaping the behavior of the desired model”, including the rule that “the assistant should not respond to the requests of private or sensitive information about people, even if the information is available somewhere via the Internet. Whether the information is private or sensitive, partially depends on the context.”

That’s it very well, but the problem is that these big language models are not aware of the internet -related context that would explain the reason for requesting any specific information in the first place.

This experiment has taught me that the Improvised IQ creates an unequal world on the Internet. Only those who have been born with a lot of content can be searched and depth in this way. I think we need to start paying. But I may be just pressure and confrontation. normal.

[email protected]