I sent the anthropier

In the battle between two coding tools “agent” – anthropology Claude icon And Openai’s Codex Cli – The latter seems more goodwill to developers than before. This is at least partly because the Antarbur has released removal notifications to a developer tries to reversed the Claude engineering code, which is subject to the most restricted use license of Codex Cli.

Claude Code and Codex Cli are fencing tools that accomplish a lot of the same thing: allow developers to take advantage of the strength of artificial intelligence models that work in the cloud to complete various coding tasks. Humans and Openai issued them within months of each other – each company is racing to capture a valuable developer.

The source code for Codex Cli is available within the APache 2.0 license that allows distribution and commercial use. This is unlike the Claud Code, which is associated with the commercial licensing of the anthropologist. This limits how to modify it without explicit permission from the company.

The Antarbur “encouraged” the source code of Claude’s symbol. In other words, the Claude Code source code is not available easily. When a The developer cancels expansion And the source code was issued to Gitap, I presented the Anthrop DMCA complaint – Publishing rights notification requests the removal of the symbol.

Developers On social media It was not pleased Through this step, which they said they compared undoubtedly with Openai’s start from Codex Cli. In the week or so since the Codex Cli release, Openai merge dozens of developers’ suggestions at the tool code base, including one that allows Codex Cli Click on artificial intelligence models from competing service providers – Including man.

Antarbur did not respond to the comment. To be fair to the laboratory, Claude Code is still in beta (And carts that are drawn by animals); Anthropor can release the source symbol under the future license in the future. Companies have many reasons aimed at overcoming the code and security considerations, one of them.

It is a somewhat sudden public relations victory for Openai, which has moved away from the open releases of sources for the confined products. It may be a symbol of a broader transformation in the laboratory approach; The CEO of Openai Sam Altman said earlier this year He thought The company was on the “wrong side of history” when it comes to the source of the source.