I have asked for an Amnesty International to fill the Arch of MARCH MADNESS – Here is what happened

Imagine if a large team of 200 people could have a deliberate conversation in an actual time, as they exchange ideas efficiently, exchange knowledge, discuss alternatives, and quickly meet with improved AI. Is this possible – and if so, will it exaggerate them? Collective intelligence?

There is a technique of new artificial intelligence, and the intelligence of conversation (or simply HyperChat), This enables teams of any potential size to engage in actual time conversations and quickly meet in improved AI solutions. To put this in the test, I asked the AI’s research team unanimously to collect 50 random sports fans and the task of the large group that quickly creates the March Madness SIM through the actual time conversation deliberations.

Before I tell you how the experiment is going, I need to explain why we were unable to bring 50 people at the enlargement meeting and make them create a slice together quickly. Research shows that the ideal size for a truly conversation is fruitful Only 4 to 7 people. In small groups, each individual gets a great deal of broadcast time to express their views and have a low waiting time to respond to others. But with the growth of the group size, the broadcast time rises, the waiting time-and over ten people turns into a series of monologues. Above 20 people, it is chaos.

How can 50 people have a conversation, 250, or even 2500?

HyperChat works by breaking any large group to a A group of parallel groups. Then, Amnesty International adds to each sub -group called a “alternative to conversation” in charge of distillation of human visions within its local group and the participation of these ideas quickly as a natural box with other groups. These alternative factors allow all sub -groups of overlap and tip of local conversations in one big conversation. It works, enabling groups of any volume that is likely to think of brainstorming, setting priorities, discussing and manipulating in actual time.

HyperChat has been invented not only to make communication and cooperation very effective on a large scale, but significantly Increase the intelligence group. The progress was quickly on this front, and the team teams are already using a commercial platform called Thinkscape^® This enables hundreds of people to hold improved deliberations in the actual time.

But does HyperChat make the difference more intelligent (can you predict the results of March Madness)?

To test this in full public opinion, I asked the team at Amnesty International unanimously to bring together 50 random sports fans on their Thinkscape platform and create the March Madness. Then the resulting arc was inserted into March march march competition So we can track the extent of its success against another 30 million people. It is striking that the pillar created by 50 random people perform 99 percent (1.4 % higher) in the ESPN competition. Here are the statistics:

Of course, anything can happen as the tournament continues this week, but so far, the collective intelligence that has been created between this excessive group of fans surpasses my expectations. This is not the first time that this technology was surprised.

in 2024 studies By Carnegie Mellon researchers and artificial intelligence consensus, groups of 35 people were asked to perform standard IQ tests by HyperChat. The results showed that groups of indiscriminate participants, whose average intelligence rate (fifty percentage) when working on their own, was working, and an effective intelligence rate of 128 (percentage 97) when trading on the HyperChat platform. This is the performance at the talented level.

In another 2024 studiesGroups of 75 people have been asked to storm together in the actual time to solve the creative challenge. The collections did this several times, half using the standard chat and half using HyperChat in Thinkscape. Then the groups compared the experiment and stated that when communicating via HyperChat, they felt more productive and more cooperative and showed better solutions (P <0.001). They also reported the existence of more "participation" in the solutions that appeared and the feeling of "more ownership" in this process (P <0.001).

This technology has sparked me for a long time, not only because it makes human groups smarter. It also has the ability to enable hybrid groups of human participants and artificial intelligence agents to cooperate on an unlimited scale, which provides improved decisions Keep humans in the episode. Doing this requires adding a second type of artificial intelligence agent to the HyperChat structure known as the “shareholder agent”. These agents provide realistic content in the actual time to support continuous human deliberations. The aim of this is to enable hybrid cancellation.

This hybrid technique was tested for the first time in A. 2024 studies This collected groups of humans and artificial intelligence agents to establish a fictional baseball team using a real -time structure. The results showed that large cooperation groups found that the superior structure of excessive is a very fruitful means of circulation, as 87 % of the participants express that it led to great better decisions.

total, Intelligence conversation swarm It is a strong use of artificial intelligence agents that can turn radically by enabling real time Talks between teams of any size. Given that Fortune 1000 has more than 30,000 employees and has functional difference with hundreds of members, this can solve the tall -term bottle neck that limits deliberations in the actual time of small teams. It is also an effective way to take advantage of the strength of artificial intelligence in critical decisions while preserving humans in control.

The March Madness will last this week. Anything can happen, but I think the collective intelligence that was harmed by those randomly randomly will fulfill well. We’ll see …

Luis Rosenberg was established Mymersion Corp and Consensus of artificial intelligence.