How software engineers already use artificial intelligence

Will Amnesty International eat the functions of programming completely one day?

The programmer we included almost strong opinions on this topic were. Below is the ChatGPT summary of the responses (with a bold, preserved focus):

“Programmers have spoken – and they do not fill their keyboards yet. While a small group but an audio insists on will Devour Timely programming functions, most of the full automation rejects the pipeline. the Death prophets It warns that the companies’ heads will Slash Payrolls The moment when artificial intelligence seems capable, leaving human engineers to correct their limitations. the Skeptical The irony, the controversy is that artificial intelligence resembles a super trainee –Useful, but ignorantIt can not deal with context, edge cases, or solve real problems. the Realistic See Amnesty International as a Double strength, not job killer– Repeated coding, but leaving creativity, architecture, and human correction. “If artificial intelligence eats programming,” one of them put it, “I will only turn into artificial intelligence.”* The real judgment? Amnesty International does not come to your work –But it changes it. Adaptation or leaving behind. “

*No one has already said this! ChatGPT – Piless IT – made many errors during this process. Not only did it make price offers, but rather offending the results, creating incomprehensible charts, and at multiple points, stopped calculating the “independents” completely as a category. rude.**

** On his way, Chatgpt called these comments. When asked about the final advice, he suggested “a touch of SNARK, because artificial intelligence speech is full of strong opinions.”