He says Exec

Google It aims at the efforts of the Ministry of Justice to reform its search engine a few days before a hearing in the Federal Court, where senior executives of the company described the proposed reforms of the government as “excessive” and pose potential risks for consumers, companies and landscapes of national security.

One of the senior executives of Google inspected the anti -company argument in an interview on Friday with Fox News Digital, noting that, in their opinion, the treatments proposed by the Ministry of Justice are “largely wide” and exceeded “what the court requested in August, when the American boycott judge Amit Mihita bends with the government and decided that Google runs illegal profitability in Local search online.

The proposed treatment frame for the Ministry of Justice includes steps such as Chrome’s disposal, Google, and possibly Android; Google requirements to detect consumer data and consumer search information with other companies during the next ten years, Including companies It is located outside the United States. The extensive options for “self -assignment”, which would limit the user’s access to innovative integration operations, including artificial intelligence features, Google and Google, which allow users to search through their photos or use their camera.

Zuckerberg bears early barbecue on the first day of the Meta Monopoly trial

the Accused of the Ministry of Justice Google is to keep it over the years by pushing Internet browsers and smartphone manufacturers, such as Apple and Samsung, to automatically show the search engine on their devices.

While Google competes for the court’s decision, plans to appeal the case, the company also sees a danger in the framework of heavy treatments the regulations that the government presented to the court, as Kent Walker, the head of Google for Global Affairs, told Fox News Digital in an interview.

On the eve of the 15-day proof hearing, which kicks off on Monday in Washington, DC, Walker explained Google concerns with the government’s plan-noting that, from their point of view, the proposal of the Ministry of Justice to dismantle Google search engine operations “goes beyond” the relief that the judge of the Federal Court requested.

“We are very concerned about the proposal of the Ministry of Justice,” Walker told Fox News Digital. “We believe that it will harm American consumers, our economy, our technical leadership, and even national security.”

Google’s executive officials described it as an “extremist proposal” that would put safety and privacy to millions; Cold investments in artificial intelligence; It hurts innovative services, including Mozilla’s Firefox, which depends on Google for search mode.

The amount of the Senate Committee tells that a dead woman undermines US national security to reach China

The proposed reform by the Ministry of Justice “will lead to an unprecedented government transcendence that would harm American consumers, developers and small companies – and weakens the global economic and technological leadership in America at risk at the moment it needs more.” He said in a blog post Soon after the proposal of the Ministry of Justice was issued.

In addition to the steps described above, the Ministry of Justice reform proposal includes wide options for “self-assignment”, which would limit users access to innovative integrations currently assembled in Google-search including AI’s results, Google’s translation, and the newer Google lens, a feature that allows users to search using an image or camera of their phone.

This week, the company presented an alternative proposal for treatments, which says more precisely for decades of research, which was at the heart of the anti -monopoly issue.

“The basic result here was that we were paying to distribute the research in ways that made it difficult for competitors to compete,” Walker told Fox News Digital. So our proposals deal with that, and say, well, well, we will set our contracts so that we do not pay for every point of access via a device. ”

This includes shorter contracts for browser companies, Like apples And Mozilla. New contracts with Android, to allow additional flexibility and download option before multiple search engines; He said that the other important steps to make the scene more competitive.

“In short, it deals with the remedial methods of Google much more than the specified behavior that the court found that it is an anti -competition in the stage of responsibility in this case and provides competitors with the opportunity to innovate and compete for future advantages while preserving Google’s incentives”, she wrote the technology giant in its court file.

Now, the treatment submitted to the Federal Court will be required to take certain steps to correct these perceived errors.

Get Fox Business on the Go by clicking here

The victory of the Ministry of Justice in the case last year is important – it was the first successful lawsuit to combat monopoly that the United States filed against a major technical company since the United States against Microsoft In 2001.

But it is unclear whether her relief plan will be successful.

“This looks like a backward issue, (dealing with) the things that occurred 10 years ago, at the time of unprecedented innovation,” Walker said of the Reform proposal in the Ministry of Justice.

Both the lawyer of the Ministry of Justice and the lawyers of the Ministry of Justice will restore on Monday to the hearing in Washington, DC