Google is proposing alternative remedies to its search monopoly after the Justice Department demanded sweeping changes

Google introduced a Explains how to address the antitrust violations the Department of Justice has accused us of, yet It faces restrictions that would prevent it from favoring its own search engine in Android. Judge Amit Mehta of the US District Court for the District of Columbia In August, Google violated Section 2 of the Sherman Act, W Google said in the motion submitted Friday night that it disagreed with the ruling but suggested ways to make its contracts with browser companies and Android device makers more flexible.

In a Summarizing the filing, Google’s vice president of regulatory affairs, Lee-Anne Mulholland, wrote that the proposal would allow browser companies like Apple and Mozilla “to continue to offer Google Search to their users and earn revenue from that partnership,” while allowing them to have “multi-default” agreements across different platforms. (For example, a different default search engine for iPhone and iPad) and browsing modes. Browsers will be able to change their default search provider every 12 months. The proposal would also give device makers “additional flexibility to preload multiple search engines, and preload any Google app independently of Search or Chrome preloading.”

Google said it plans to appeal the judge’s decision before the hearing in April, and will file a revised motion on March 7. The agenda “goes well beyond the actual purpose of the court’s decision – our agreements with our partners to distribute research.”