Generative AI is my research and writing partner. Should I disclose it?

“If I’m using an AI tool for research or to help me create something, should I cite it in my completed work as a source? How can you properly attribute AI tools when using them?

– Citation Finder

Dear quote,

The direct answer is that if you use Generative artificial intelligence For research purposes, disclosure may not be necessary. However, attribution may be required if you use it ChatGPT Or another AI tool for configuration.

Anytime you feel ethically conflicted about disclosing your association with an AI programmingHere are two guiding questions I think you should ask yourself: Have you used AI in research or authorship? He may be the beneficiary of this Artificial intelligence-assisted composition Would you feel misled if the tools turned out to be synthetic rather than organic? Granted, these questions may not fit perfectly into every situation, and academics are certainly held to a higher standard when it comes to appropriate citation, however I fully believe that taking five minutes to think can help you understand appropriate usage and avoid unnecessary headaches.

Distinguishing between research and composition is a crucial first step. If I’m using generative AI as a kind of Unreliable encyclopedia This can point me towards other sources or broaden my view on a topic, but not as part of the actual writing, I think this is less problematic and less likely to leave the stench of deception. Always double-check any facts you pass in chatbot output, and never reference ChatGPT or Confusion page As a primary source of truth. Most chatbots can now link to external sources on the web, so you can click through to read more. Think of it, in this context, as part of the information infrastructure. ChatGPT can be the road you drive on, but the final destination should be an external link.

Let’s say you decide to use a chatbot to sketch out your first draft, or ask it to write/image/audio/video to mix it into your draft. In this case, I think the disclosure error is smart. Even Dominos cheese sticks in the Uber Eats app now include a disclaimer that the food description was generated by AI and may include inaccurate ingredients.

Every time you use AI for creativity, and in some cases for research, you should focus on the second question. Essentially, ask yourself whether the reader or viewer will feel cheated by learning later that those parts of what they experienced were generated by artificial intelligence. If so, you should absolutely use proper attribution by explaining how you use the tool, out of respect for your audience. Not only will parts of this column be created without disclosure WIRED Policyit would also just be a dry and unenjoyable experience for both of us.

By considering who will enjoy your work and your intentions for creating it in the first place, you can add context to the use of your AI. This context is useful for overcoming difficult situations. In most cases, a Work email This data generated by AI and reviewed by you is likely good. However, using generative AI to craft a posthumous condolence email would be an example of insensitivity, something that is becoming common. It actually happened. If someone on the other side of the call is seeking to connect with you on a personal and emotional level, consider closing the ChatGPT browser tab and pulling down the tab Notepad and pen.

“How can educators teach teens how to use AI tools responsibly and ethically? Do the benefits of AI outweigh the threats?”

– Raised hand