FTC is looking at Trump to monitor technology platforms

Federal Trade Committee Declare On Thursday, it will launch a general investigation into “control by technology platforms”, or to seek comments from people who feel that they have been subjected to Satan, prohibiting them, or another in another way because of their discourse or affiliations.

Andrew Ferguson, Chairman of the Federal Trade Committee, said in a statement: “Technology companies should not be bullying their users.” “This FTC investigation will help a better understanding of how these companies violate the law by silence the Americans and intimidating them to talk about their minds.”

FTC to request For general suspension, the laws that FTC believe do not specify that platforms can violate.

However, the organizer claims that these policies-which can sometimes cause creative online loss of access to their accounts without any appeal-can be considered anti-competition.

Creators have confused their mysterious relationship with large technology platforms. Startups to supply creators with insurance to protect against accounts, which may lead to income losses. However, the protest in FTC for the content of the content may be a distraction, as this announcement comes at a time when social media executives such as Mark Zuckerberg and Elon Musk are alleviating the restrictions imposed on Hate speech And call to question relationship Between moderate content and first modification.

Cathy Gillis, an expertise in technology and freedom of expression, told Techcrunch that this investigation seems to be offended the first modification scope.

While the first amendment restricts the government from interfering in individuals’ discourse, it does not limit private actors, such as most of the online technology platforms.

“In most cases, internet platforms are private actors, which have their first amendment rights to reduce their sites as they will choose,” said Gillis. “If anything is this investigation by FTC, which is a government representative itself, threatens to violate the first amendment, by seeking to intervene with the editorial appreciation that the Internet platforms are entitled to obtain.”

Section 230 of the law of decent communication often protects the Internet platforms from being responsible for the illegal content that individuals have published. In recent years, the Supreme Court heard cases challenge Legislation, which was written in 1996, before the presence of social media as is the case today. However, the court updated Article 230 after multiple legal challenges.

Although Zuckerberg and Musk appealed to the first amendment as is the case mitigation Evan Spiegel, CEO of Snap Exhperation and Snap Excetic, says that his peers misunderstand the first amendment.

“Many platforms mainly say, as you know, we support the first amendment, so anyone on our platform should be able to say anything, but this is a kind of misunderstanding what the first amendment does.” An interview with YouTubes Colin and Samir. “In fact, the platform can choose any guidelines or policies of the content it wants under the first amendment. Thus I think there was a little wrong guidance mostly, perhaps because people do not want moderate content, because when they do it, the participation decreases.”

On Wednesday, President Trump signed Executive order This makes independent organizers, such as SEC and FTC, are responsible in front of the White House, which may affect this investigation. But experts remain Skeptical About the constitutionality of Trump Decree.