Fast food from The Times Interview with Chuck Schumer on the Federal Expenditure Bill

Senate minority leader Chuck Schumer is facing the largest rebellion of Democrats for years, however In a conversation with the interview After his decisive vote, which supports the Republican Federal Expenditure Bill last week, he tried to get rid of questions about whether he should step down. Democratic officials seemed amazed when Schumer was placed around the draft spending law, on the pretext that the option was less than two. Schumer defended his decision in the second part of our wide interview, even as questions about his leadership continued by senior party officials.

Here are three fast food from our closure part conversation.

Shomer explained that he made his voice to prevent further judge by the government by Dog and Trump.

Schumer said that he made a “very difficult” decision to support the Republican law in order to avoid closing the government, said President Trump and Eileon Musk. Trump and Musk called the “anti -government fanatics” and “nihilism”.

He said they wanted to close the “after the agency”, which will create a much worse situation than the Republican draft law. He continued:

Two days after now, they can say, well, food stamps are not necessary. He went. All old warriors’ offices disappeared in rural areas. Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid. It is not necessary. We cut them. So it will be terrible. The damage they can do under the closure is much worse than any other damage they can.

Isn’t this only – Wait, let me finish just, Lulu. It can continue forever. There is no slope road. A Republican Senate member told us: We go to stop the operation, there will be for six months and nine months, a year. By that time, their goal of destroying the federal government will disappear. Finally, a final point here, now under CR, you can go to court and compete for an executive order to close something. Under turning off, the executive branch has a single power.

He admitted that he and Jeffrez have not spoken since the vote.

While he agreed to the presence of “sections” inside his party about his vote, he insisted that he and his democratic colleagues respect each other and that they are united in their battle against Trump.

Shomer reluctantly acknowledged that he and the leader of the Parliament’s minority, Hakim Jeffrez, who often spoke, have not spoken since Shomer’s sudden vote, indicating a rupture among the senior Democrats in Congress.